Latin American governments haven't yet turned to one traditional
source of aid as they combat the global economic crisis: the widely
vilified International Monetary Fund.
The IMF became the
target of popular contempt across the region for conditioning billions
of dollars in much-needed loans on a so-called Washington consensus of
policy dictates, including privatization, deregulation and balanced
budgets.
Many Latin American leaders blame those
requirements for worsening economic hardships in the 1980s and 1990s
rather than easing them, and pan what they consider the IMF's continued
heavy-handedness.
"The fund is not giving the world what it
needs," Argentine Economy Minister Carlos Fernandez said on behalf of
six South American countries at an annual IMF meeting this month. "Its
financial assistance fails to provide the services members seek, as it
continues to send immediate negative signals (and) comes with too many
conditionalities."
Raw memories of their experiences with
the fund's tight lending terms make it unlikely that Latin Americans
will run for IMF help again.
"There's definitely a feeling
that the solution that was imposed on them often exacerbated the
economic illness rather than helped with the cure," said Shannon
O'Neil, a Latin America expert at the Council on Foreign Relations in
New York. "There's a real hesitation to borrow from the IMF, because
there were so many strings attached."
These days, Brazil,
Mexico, Argentina, Venezuela, Uruguay and others have paid off their
debts to the fund, winning greater independence in policy-making.
Even
as global turmoil spreads, Latin American economies are now healthier
than before. And should they need help, they have a greater variety of
multinational lenders to choose from.
The Washington-based
Inter-American Development Bank, the Bogota-based Latin American
Reserves Fund and the Caracas-based Andean Development Corp. pledged
US$9.3 billion in emergency loans last week to ease regional
cash-supply problems.
"We're putting everything we've got on the grill," IDB President Luis Alberto Moreno said.
The
governments of Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay and
Bolivia have meanwhile formed a new Bank of the South to finance
development themselves.
Elsewhere, countries such as
Iceland, Hungary and Ukraine have suggested they might seek IMF
financing to ease the current crisis. But the IMF says it has received
no formal request for help from any Latin American nation, though it's
ready to assist as soon as it does.
Created in 1944 to
rebuild the world financial system after World War II, the IMF
initially helped developed nations lend to one another. By the 1990s,
it had evolved into a rescue fund for troubled emerging economies --
but gave them little say on the terms of their loans.
"In
the mind of countries that were taking money, it became an almost
imperialist group, because the IMF lent with a lot of one-size-fits-all
conditions," O'Neil said.
In Argentina, those tight fiscal
requirements ignored the need for anti-poverty measures and prevented
the government from spending its way out of a recession, contributing
to the country's 2001 economic meltdown, O'Neil said.
An IMF spokesman declined to be quoted for this article.
The
current crisis is challenging the old balance of power: As the U.S. and
European economies shudder, other regions of the world have growth
rates and fiscal accounts that appear comparatively strong.
The
Washington consensus wasn't all bad for Latin America. Many countries
continued balancing budgets in recent years as commodity export income
soared, helping them build foreign currency reserves and lower debt
burdens. Those resources are now helping them combat the global
downturn.
Still, some Latin American leaders claim the
crisis has exposed a double standard at the IMF, whose rich-country
backers have managed their economies in ways that poorer borrowing
nations were never allowed.
"When Brazil had problems, every
day the IMF was giving us tips, saying, 'Do this' or 'Do that,'"
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said this month. "Where
are the tips they're giving now on the American crisis? Where is the
IMF? Why aren't they in Europe giving tips? It's because this is their
crisis."
Brazil and other developing nations are calling for
an IMF overhaul that puts less weight on what they consider failed U.S.
and European policies. They want increased oversight of advanced
economies and are demanding that emerging nations have a greater say in
IMF decisions so that those most likely to borrow can help set lending
terms.
Now that economic crisis is rattling wealthier parts
of the world that haven't felt the pinch in years, O'Neil said, "I
think we could soon see some of those rules changing."