'LOOK'에 해당되는 글 6건

  1. 2009.02.26 Reported Kindle 2 photos look like the real deal by CEOinIRVINE
  2. 2008.12.15 Wall Street looks to Fed, auto bailout this week by CEOinIRVINE
  3. 2008.12.14 Look of the day by CEOinIRVINE
  4. 2008.12.14 Metallic Makeup by CEOinIRVINE
  5. 2008.11.23 'Tipping Point' author looks at 'outliers' by CEOinIRVINE
  6. 2008.11.23 Look Who's Doing O.K. in the Music Business by CEOinIRVINE

(Credit: mobileread.com)

Just got an e-mail from Alexander Turcic over at MobileRead.

Turcic, based in Switzerland, writes:

Hi David:

I hope you are doing fine. Got some news regarding Kindle 2 price and release info, plus the first Kindle 2 pics.

Cheers,
Alex

According to the post, the Kindle 2, which is expected to be announced Monday at 10 a.m. in New York, will be available on February 24 and carry a list price of $359--just like its predecessor. All in all, the device looks similar to what we saw in earlier leaked photos, but in these shots the Kindle 2 looks sleeker and decidedly more impressive. While we have no confirmation that this is the real deal, these look like marketing shots if I ever saw them.

More photos after the jump.

(Credit: mobileread.com)
(Credit: mobileread.com)
(Credit: mobileread.com)
(Credit: mobileread.com)

Click here for more stories on Amazon's Kindle.

'Business' 카테고리의 다른 글

US bank regulator expands debt guarantee program  (0) 2009.02.28
Citi Reaches Deal With Uncle Sam  (0) 2009.02.28
Amazon's Kindle 2: Delight Is in the Details  (0) 2009.02.25
The InfoTech 100  (0) 2009.02.25
Why You Don't Need A Kindle Upgrade  (0) 2009.02.25
Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

Don't expect Wall Street's turmoil to ebb in the year's last full week of trading as investors face questions about an auto bailout, the banking crisis, and the Federal Reserve's final rate-setting meeting of 2008.

The market, still hovering at decade lows, has yet to show any sign of a traditional year-end rally. And the next few days it will face a number of tests that could determine if investors are able to get past all the negative economic news to end the year on a bright note.

The fate of Detroit's three biggest automakers continues to be in question this week after the Senate failed to pass a $14 billion bailout for the Chrysler LLC and General Motors Corp. Ford Motor Co. has said in the past that it does not need government money to survive.

The White House this week is expected to unveil ways to provide emergency aid to the automakers, which have said they could run out of cash within weeks without government help. Many expect that the Bush administration will use money from the $700 billion financial bailout fund to provide loans to the carmakers.

"If the administration had some notion that this was a house of cards, that this was going to bring the entire economy down, then they have the authority to write checks out of the already passed bailout program," said Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Harris Private Bank in Chicago.

On Sunday evening, major stock indexes were modestly higher in futures trading. Dow Jones industrial average futures rose 49 points, or 0.56 percent, to 8,738. Standard & Poor's 500 index futures added 5.00, or 0.56 percent, to 891.00; while Nasdaq-100 futures rose 7.25, or 0.60 percent, to 1,220.75.

That might add to Wall Street's resilient performance on Friday after it rebounded from an early sell-off to end higher after the government said it would assist troubled U.S. automakers. The Dow rose 0.75 percent, and ended the week with a loss of just 0.07 percent.

The S&P 500 rose 0.42 percent last week, while the Nasdaq advanced 2.08 percent. For the year, the Dow is down 34.9 percent, the S&P 500 is down 40.1 percent and the Nasdaq is off 41.9 percent.

"The market's been pretty resilient," said Matt King, chief investment officer of Bell Investment Advisors. "The bad news keeps coming out ... but the market's been holding firm and making some good gains. So to us that's a good sign."

Along with uncertainty about the auto sector, the Fed's policy meeting on Monday and Tuesday will also remain in focus. The central bank is expected to lower its benchmark fed funds rate by a half-percentage point to 0.5 percent.

But, with rates so low, that means the Fed will soon run out of room to lower interest rates further to stimulate the economy.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley, the two biggest U.S. investment banks, will report results this week.

Analysts expect Goldman on Tuesday will report its first loss since becoming a public company in 1999. Morgan Stanley is also expected to report a loss during the fourth quarter.

Investors will also pore over economic reports, including Tuesday's release of the government's Consumer Price Index for November and housing starts.

Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

Look of the day

Fashion 2008. 12. 14. 13:36

'Fashion' 카테고리의 다른 글

“Celebrity Hairstyles Rihanna”  (0) 2008.12.20
Red Carpet  (0) 2008.12.20
Girly Girl  (0) 2008.12.14
tea time  (0) 2008.12.14
Roberto Cavalli  (0) 2008.12.14
Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

Metallic Makeup

Fashion 2008. 12. 14. 13:28

'Fashion' 카테고리의 다른 글

tea time  (0) 2008.12.14
Roberto Cavalli  (0) 2008.12.14
Prada People  (0) 2008.12.14
Forver 21  (0) 2008.12.14
aw 2008 coats  (0) 2008.12.11
Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font

(CNN) -- Why are some people amazingly successful -- and other people with the same intelligence or abilities just part of the crowd?

Malcolm Gladwell tries to find out why some people are successful in his new book, "Outliers."

Malcolm Gladwell tries to find out why some people are successful in his new book, "Outliers."

Malcolm Gladwell, the New Yorker writer who's made a living dissecting questions such as how small trends become major movements ("The Tipping Point") and the value of snap judgments ("Blink"), was curious about that subject, and -- typically -- set out to find some answers.

The result is his new book "Outliers" (Little, Brown), which finds parallels between the Beatles, Bill Gates and Canadian hockey players -- as well as reasons why planes operated by members of particular cultures have a greater likelihood of crashing.

John Roberts of CNN's "American Morning" spoke to Gladwell on Friday. The following is an edited version of that interview.

CNN: We always think that it's the smartest people that become the most successful. You postulate in this new book [that] it's not always intelligence that leads to success. You say "it's not the brightest who succeed, it's rather a gift. Outliers are those given opportunities who have the strength and presence of mind to seize them." But there are also some commonalities with these outliers.

Malcolm Gladwell: Yes. I'm really interested in things like the effects of generation. So what does it mean? I have a chapter that looks at some of the most powerful people in Silicon Valley. And almost all of them are born in 1955: Steve Jobs at Apple, Bill Gates at Microsoft, Bill Joy -- who is one of those famous programmers -- a bunch of guys at Sun Microsystems. The argument there is that they were 21 when the computer revolution hit, and that's how old you want to be when you're confronted with a new revolution.

That's the kind of pattern that you see, over and over again, when you look at the lives of very successful people. That it's not just their own abilities, it's being in the right place at the right time, it's coming from a certain kind of culture, it's having certain built-in advantages.

CNN: There were also some happy accidents along the way. For example, if Bill Gates hadn't been put into a private school, which actually had a computer -- one of the first schools to ever have a computer -- perhaps he may not have become the mogul that he was.

Gladwell: Yes, he has this incredible childhood. ... I talked to him, and he was going through the extraordinary one-in-a-million lucky breaks that characterized his childhood. He got to start programming on a computer in 1968 as a 13-year-old when nobody was programming. So he was way ahead of the crowd by the time he starts Microsoft.

CNN: You and I both lived in Canada, developed a love for Canadian hockey, and you found by looking at Canadian hockey teams that there's a certain commonality between all of the best players, at least in the junior hockey league system, which I imagine translates to the pros as well.

Gladwell: Oh, absolutely. An extraordinary number of hockey players who are professionals are born in January, February and March. And that's because the cutoff date for age-class hockey is January 1st. So when they go to ... recruit kids for all-star teams when they're 8 or 9 years old, they think they're choosing the most talented ones, but actually they're choosing the biggest ones. Because if you're born in January and you're 8, you're a lot taller, more mature and taller and bigger and stronger than someone born in December.

CNN: Because development is much faster there --

Gladwell: At that age, and so that advantage you get as an 8-year-old, you get plucked out and given proper coaching and more games and more practice -- and by the time you're 18, you actually are better.

CNN: Another fascinating finding is that you are more likely to be in a plane crash if the pilot comes from a particular country. What's that all about?

Gladwell: Yes. That's a fascinating thing. The single most important variable in determining whether a plane crashes is not the plane, it's not the maintenance, it's not the weather, it's the culture the pilot comes from. Planes are flown safely when the pilot and co-pilot are in open and honest communication. And in cultures where it is difficult for a junior person to speak openly to a superior, you have lots of plane crashes.

CNN: And you said the Avianca crash here in [New York's] Oyster Bay ... is a very clear example of that.

Gladwell: Where the co-pilot was so intimidated by air traffic control, he could not tell them they were running out of fuel, and they crashed. They just go around and crashed.

CNN: Some of the ideas of this book were criticized by The New York Times, which said the book "is glib, poorly reasoned, thoroughly unconvincing. Much of what Mr. Gladwell has to say about superstars is little more than common sense: that talent alone is not enough to assure success, that opportunity, hard work, timing and luck play important roles as well." What do you say about that?

Gladwell: I don't think -- I start from a very common-sense premise, but it takes you in all kinds of interesting areas. I wouldn't say that you know the stuff about pilots, the stuff about hockey players being born in January, it doesn't sound like common sense to me. So you know, I think what's interesting about this book is I take a series of ideas which we all know, and then I say, look, it's more complicated and more interesting and more fascinating than we would have ever imagined.

CNN: Anything we can do to try to employ some of these techniques?

Gladwell: Well, the end of the book talks about what we should be doing as a country. It's less about what we can do. When we understand that success is so much a part of the world of which we're a part, we move away from this idea that's about self-help and we move towards this idea that it's time for us to be providing opportunities to a group.


Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

http://images.businessweek.com/story/08/370/1120_mz_music.jpg

Back in 2004, when Edgar Bronfman Jr. and his private equity partners took control of storied Warner Music Group (WMG), expectations for the new management were anything but lofty. After all, Bronfman was widely derided in those days as a dynastic bumbler who while at Vivendi Universal lost billions of his family's fortune. And the music business was in crisis. Even now, Bronfman equates running Warner with flying a plane while fixing the engine.

Yet he has managed to do something that has eluded his rivals over the past four years: boost album sales, which still account for the vast majority of revenues in recorded music. Even as such rivals as Sony/BMG and EMI were sidetracked by management turmoil, Bronfman, 53, focused on the basics—nurturing artists who can move records. He and his lieutenants declined to comment, citing a quiet period ahead of Warner's fiscal-year earnings report on Nov. 25. But amid all the industry upheaval, Bronfman's achievement hasn't gone unnoticed. "Edgar," says Laura Martin, an analyst at Soleil Securities Group, "has shown real leadership."

None of this is to say Bronfman has solved the music industry's central conundrum: how to prosper in a digital age. Like most of its rivals, Warner continues to post anemic operating profits and essentially flat revenue growth. But closely guarded industry sales numbers reviewed by BusinessWeek show that Warner has opened up a surprising edge over its competitors. Warner's album sales—which include physical CDs, digital albums, and digital tracks (10 singles are now counted as one album)—are up 5% for the first 10 months of 2008 vs. the same period in 2004, when Bronfman arrived. Sounds less than thrilling—until you consider that Warner Music's rivals suffered double-digit declines.

How did Bronfman do it? He cut Warner's artist roster nearly 30%, ditching more than 50 acts that were no longer selling well. He refused to pay big bucks to keep the likes of Madonna and Nickelback out of rivals' hands. And he found some $300 million in annual cost savings. Result: Warner had more time and money to focus on new potential hitmakers.

FRESH ANGLES

Other music companies have slashed budgets for artists and repertory (A&R), the department that finds and nurtures talent. Not Bronfman, whose hundreds of scouts spend their nights in clubs, from Manchester to Seoul, and their days on MySpace (GOOG), finding new chart toppers such as James Blunt, Gnarls Barkley, and Panic At The Disco. The strategy is paying off: Warner's share of U.S. sales of new releases is up 7% since 2004, vs. a decline of 2% for the rest of the industry, according to Nielsen SoundScan, which tracks music sales.

All to the good. But doesn't the recording industry need to reinvent itself big time? It does, and Bronfman knows that. He was the first to package interviews and concert footage with digital albums as bonus features and charge a premium for them. Like his rivals, he's embracing ringtones and ad-supported music Web sites. He is licensing more songs for TV and movies. He is taking a piece of artists' concert and merchandising earnings. But making serious money from these initiatives remains a ways off. In the meantime, Bronfman is shoring up the traditional side of his business: finding hot acts and selling millions of their albums.

Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l