'Team'에 해당되는 글 7건

  1. 2008.12.08 The Business Of Basketball by CEOinIRVINE
  2. 2008.12.04 Obama Teams Are Scrutinizing Federal Agencies by CEOinIRVINE
  3. 2008.12.03 Double Digit Returns From Stocks And Bonds? by CEOinIRVINE
  4. 2008.11.29 Creating a Computer Security Incident Response Team: A Process for Getting Started by CEOinIRVINE
  5. 2008.11.26 A Market-Oriented Economic Team by CEOinIRVINE
  6. 2008.11.25 Obama Offers Glimpse of Policy as He Names Economic Team by CEOinIRVINE
  7. 2008.11.07 Obama Team Shifts to Transition Mode by CEOinIRVINE
.
Last season was a rousing success for the National Basketball Association. The league's two marquee teams, the Boston Celtics and Los Angeles Lakers, met in the finals, and television ratings soared 51% over the prior year. The league's two biggest stars, Kobe Bryant and LeBron James, were on winning teams and getting a lot of prime-time exposure, wowing fans and sponsors.

League-wide revenues hit a record $3.8 billion during the 2007-08 season, 6% more than the prior campaign, and the average team posted a profit (in the sense of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) of $10.6 million, the highest amount since Forbes began tracking NBA finances 10 years ago.

The typical NBA franchise is now worth a record $379 million, 2% more than last year. The new eight-year agreements with ABC, ESPN and TNT that began with the 2008-09 season are worth $7.4 billion, 21% more than the prior deals on an annual basis.

By The Numbers: The NBA's Most Valuable Teams

Three teams experienced double-digit gains in value this year, led by the Portland Trail Blazers, whose value increased 21% to $307 million. Owner Paul Allen took control of the Rose Garden last year after he relinquished his stake in the arena during bankruptcy proceedings during 2004. The move gave Allen access to the arena's revenue streams, including luxury suites, concessions and ad signage.

The Celtics' NBA-record, 42-win regular season improvement and NBA title boasted the value of the franchise 14% to $447 million, ninth highest in the league. Meanwhile, Oklahoma City Thunder owner Clay Bennett resurrected the team formerly known as the Seattle SuperSonics, trading in a half-empty arena with a crummy lease in Seattle for a sold-out building in Oklahoma City where he keeps all of the revenues. The value of the Thunder is $300 million, 12% more than last year.

But troubles in the overall economy will make this year much more difficult for the NBA. Season ticket renewals and new sales are down this season. The NBA recently laid off 9% of its staff on concerns over the economy. Consider, too, some of the arena naming rights partners for teams around the league: American Airlines (nyse: AMR - news - people ), Conseco (nyse: CNOPRB - news - people ), Ford Motor (nyse: F - news - people ), United Airlines (nasdaq: UAUA - news - people ) and Wachovia (nyse: WB - news - people ).

Each of these companies saw its stock dive more than 80% at some point over the past 12 months, and some sponsors might look to back out of their deals. Many companies are scrutinizing every expense these days, and some teams are going to have problems when it comes to getting sponsors to sign on for next season.

Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

Wearing yellow badges and traveling in groups of 10 or more, agency review teams for President-elect Barack Obama have swarmed into dozens of government offices, from the Pentagon to the National Council on Disability.

With pointed questions and clear ground rules, they are dissecting agency initiatives, poring over budgets and unearthing documents that may prove crucial as a new Democratic president assumes control. Their job is to minimize the natural tension between incoming and outgoing administrations, but their work also is creating anxiety among some Bush administration officials as the teams rigorously examine programs and policies.

Lisa Brown, who served as counsel to Vice President Al Gore and is helping manage the reviews, said typical questions include: "Which is the division that has really run amok? Or that has run out of money? If someone is confirmed, what's going to be on their desk from Day One? What are the main things that need to happen, vis-a-vis Obama's priorities?"

Every presidential changeover includes some type of review of the federal landscape, but some have succeeded more than others, experts say. Obama's teams -- 135 people divided into 10 groups, along with a list of other advisers -- started earlier than most, gearing up months before Election Day with preliminary planning, and will work until mid-December preparing reports to guide the White House, Cabinet members and other senior officials.

The team members include Democratic Party loyalists jockeying for senior administration jobs and subject experts in areas ranging from military systems to Medicare policy.

The Obama teams say they have benefited from a commitment by the Bush White House to cooperate as fully as possible to ease the shift.

"President Bush initiated preparations for the transition earlier, and with more extensive planning, than has ever been done before," said White House spokesman Tony Fratto. "We've also benefited from new legal authorities that allowed for better preparation of the transition teams. As we're at war, defending the nation against terrorist threats, and addressing a global financial crisis, it's more critical than ever that we have a successful transition."

John D. Podesta, a former Clinton White House chief of staff and co-chairman of the Obama transition, said the Obama teams have been dispatched with "clear roles and missions." In assembling the study groups, Podesta drew heavily from the Clinton administration, academia and think tanks such as his own, the Center for American Progress. Many team members were informal advisers to Obama throughout the campaign -- such as Sarah Sewall, a Harvard University human rights specialist who is a leader of the national security team.

Many chosen for the teams come with high-level, firsthand knowledge of certain agencies.

"They were part of that culture; they understand the political issues as well as the bureaucratic issues," said Melody C. Barnes, Obama's incoming Domestic Policy Council director, who is helping with the agency reviews.

Some teams parachuted in at the top. At the State Department, Obama team leaders Tom Donilon and Wendy R. Sherman met with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. At the Pentagon, transition team members John White and Michèle A. Flournoy dropped by the offices of four senior officials and arranged for further interviews over the coming days. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates named a transition leader, Robert Rangel, to work with the group, even though Gates is slated to continue in his job when Obama takes office.

A typical approach has been playing out at the Environmental Protection Agency, where the Obama team is led by Lisa Jackson, commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, and Robert Sussman, a former Clinton official and now a lawyer and fellow at the Center for American Progress. Both are considered front-runners for senior administration jobs (Jackson as EPA administrator, Sussman as a top EPA deputy).

'Business' 카테고리의 다른 글

The Big Three's Stalemate  (0) 2008.12.04
Auto Giants Ratchet Up Pleas for Aid  (0) 2008.12.04
Haste Could Make Waste on Stimulus, States Say  (0) 2008.12.04
How To Automate Chaos  (0) 2008.12.04
Productivity growth better than expected in 3Q  (0) 2008.12.04
Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

The Forbes.com Investor Team tries to build a portfolio that will rebound strongly in 2009.

Yes, it's true. Investments can appreciate. Even as the S&P fell on Monday, the Forbes.com Investor Team happened on an asset allocation model that they hope yields double-digit returns over one and (annualized) over five years. No promises here, of course, but it is nice to hear investment strategists talk about growth again.

Dr. Bob Froehlich, chief investment strategist at DWS (Deutsche Bank's (nyse: DB - news - people ) retail unit) offered up his formula:

 

'Business' 카테고리의 다른 글

BA And Qantas Wanna Be Mates  (0) 2008.12.03
A Bullish Black Friday  (0) 2008.12.03
Nokia Takes On The iPhone  (0) 2008.12.03
What GM Will Look Like, If It Survives  (0) 2008.12.03
SKorea's 3rd-quarter economic growth revised down  (0) 2008.12.02
Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l
 

Creating a Computer Security Incident Response Team: A Process for Getting Started

Introduction
What are the questions?
What are some of the best practices for creating a CSIRT?
     Step 1: Obtain management support and buy-in
     Step 2: Determine the CSIRT strategic plan
     Step 3: Gather relevant information
     Step 4: Design the CSIRT vision
     Step 5: Communicate the CSIRT vision and operational plan
     Step 6: Begin CSIRT implementation
     Step 7: Announce the operational CSIRT
     Step 8: Evaluate CSIRT effectiveness
Remember that patience can be a key
Resources and more information on creating a CSIRT


Keeping organizational information assets secure in today's interconnected computing environment is a true challenge that becomes more difficult with each new "e" product and each new intruder tool. Most organizations realize that there is no one solution or panacea for securing systems and data; instead a multi-layered security strategy is required. One of the layers that many organizations are including in their strategy today is the creation of a Computer Security Incident Response Team, generally called a CSIRT.

Motivators driving the establishment of CSIRTs include

  • a general increase in the number of computer security incidents being reported
  • a general increase in the number and type of organizations being affected by computer security incidents
  • a more focused awareness by organizations on the need for security policies and practices as part of their overall risk-management strategies
  • new laws and regulations that impact how organizations are required to protect information assets
  • the realization that systems and network administrators alone cannot protect organizational systems and assets

What Are the Questions?

As organizations begin to build their incident response capability, they are looking to determine the best strategy for putting such a structure in place. They not only want to know what has worked well for others, but also want some guidance on the process and requirements they must follow to establish an effective incident response capability.

CSIRTs and their parent organizations have numerous questions they want answered to help them design their response capability. They are also interested in knowing what other teams in similar industry sectors are doing. Typical questions being asked include but are not limited to the following:

  • What are the basic requirements for establishing a CSIRT?
  • What type of CSIRT will be needed?
  • What type of services should be offered?
  • How big should the CSIRT be?
  • Where should the CSIRT be located in the organization?
  • How much will it cost to implement and support a team?
  • What are the initial steps to follow to create a CSIRT?

There is not a standard set of answers to these questions. CSIRTs are as unique as the organizations they service, and as a result, no two teams are likely to operate in the exact same manner. It is important for the organization to decide why it is building a CSIRT and what it wants that CSIRT to achieve. Once this is determined, then the unique set of answers to these questions can be formulated.

This document is the first in a series of articles that will discuss the issues and decisions to be addressed when planning and implementing a CSIRT. This first article will focus on an overview of the basic high-level steps to be taken by organizations as they design and build a CSIRT. The article is written as a general guideline for any organization that is thinking about undertaking such an endeavor or for any individuals who are members of a project team that is working to establish a CSIRT.

What Are Some Best Practices for Creating a CSIRT?

Although CSIRTs will differ in how they operate depending on the available staff, expertise, budget resources, and unique circumstances of each organization, there are some basic practices that apply to all CSIRTs. We will discuss some of those practices as they relate to creating a CSIRT. (For more information on what a CSIRT is, see the CSIRT FAQ.) Although these actions are presented as steps, the process is not sequential; many steps can occur in parallel.

The steps are as follows:

Step 1: Obtain Management Support and Buy-In

Our experience shows that without management approval and support, creating an effective incident response capability can be extremely difficult and problematic. This support must be shown in numerous ways, including the provision of resources, funding, and time, to the person or group of people who will act as the project team for implementing the CSIRT. This also includes executive and business or department managers and their staffs committing time to participate in this planning process; their input is essential during the design effort.

It is important to elicit management's expectations and perceptions of the CSIRT's function and responsibilities. Without this information, a team may be built whose services and authority are not understood or appropriately used by the rest of the organization.

Along with obtaining management support for the planning and implementation process, it is equally important to get management commitment to sustain CSIRT operations and authority for the long term. Once the team is established, how is it maintained and expanded with budget, personnel, and equipment resources? Will the role and authority of the CSIRT continue to be backed by management across the various constituencies or parent organization? Without this continued support the CSIRT's long-term success may be in jeopardy.

Step 2: Determine the CSIRT Development Strategic Plan

Think about how to manage the development of the CSIRT. What administrative issues must be dealt with, and what project management issues must be addressed?

  • Are there specific timeframes to be met? Are they realistic, and if not, can they be changed?
  • Is there a project group? Where do the group members come from? You want to ensure that all stakeholders are represented. Some may not be on the team for the whole project, but brought in to provide subject matter expertise and input as needed. You also want to incorporate best practices in project management, organizational behavior theory, and communications theory into your plan. If anyone has a background in these areas, consider having them participate on the team.
  • How do you let the organization know about the development of the CSIRT? A memo sent from the CIO, CEO, or other high-level manager announcing the project and asking each key stakeholder and area to provide assistance in any way possible is a good way to start. Letting the organization know about the plan for a CSIRT in the early stages of development can help staff feel they are part of the design process.
  • If you have a project team, how do you record and communicate the information you are collecting, especially if the team is geographically dispersed?

Step 3: Gather Relevant Information

Gather information to determine the incident response and service needs that the organization has. Take a look at the types of incident activity currently being reported within your constituency. This helps determine not only what type of services to offer but also the types of skills and expertise the CSIRT staff will need. For example, if your organization has been the victim of computer virus or worm activity, you will need staff with virus experience to handle the response. You will also need virus scanning, elimination, and recovery procedures, along with the appropriate anti-virus tools. You may want people with good training and documentation skills to help develop user awareness programs as a proactive step in dealing with virus activity.

Identify what information you need to know to plan and implement the CSIRT. Determine who has that information and how best to elicit that information, either through general discussions or interviews or by making them part of the project.

Meet with key stakeholders to discuss not only their incident response needs, but to achieve an initial consensus on the expectations, strategic direction, definitions, and responsibilities of the CSIRT. Your definition of what a CSIRT is and does may be very different from your manager's definition or the definition of another part of your organization. Use these discussions with the stakeholders to outline and identify how each group will need to interact with the CSIRT. The stakeholders could include but are not limited to

  • Business managers. They need to understand what the CSIRT is and how it can help support their business processes. Agreements must be made concerning the CSIRT's authority over business systems and who will make decisions if critical business systems must be disconnected from the network or shut down.
  • Representatives from IT. How does the IT staff and the CSIRT interact? What actions are taken by IT staff and what actions are taken by CSIRT members during response operations? Will the CSIRT have easy access to network and systems logs for analysis purposes? Will the CSIRT be able to make recommendations to improve the security of the organizational infrastructure?
  • Representatives from the legal department. When and how is the legal department involved in incident response efforts? Legal staff may also be needed to review non-disclosure agreements, develop appropriate wording for contacting other sites and organizations, and determine site liability for computer security incidents.
  • Representatives from human resources. They can help develop job descriptions to hire CSIRT staff, and develop policies and procedures for removing internal employees found engaging in unauthorized or illegal computer activity.
  • Representatives from public relations. They must be prepared to handle any media inquiries and help develop information-disclosure policies and practices.
  • Any existing security groups, including physical security. The CSIRT will need to exchange information with these groups about computer incidents and may share responsibility with them for resolving issues involving computer or data theft.
  • Audit and risk management specialists. They can help develop threat metrics and vulnerability assessments, along with encouraging computer security best practices across the constituency or organization.
  • General representatives from the constituency, who can provide insight into their needs and requirements.

Stakeholders should also include anyone who will be involved in the incident-handling or notification process. Think about who will need to be notified during different types of incidents. Are there people in other parts of the organization or constituency who can provide information or input to the CSIRT or with whom the CSIRT will need to share or obtain information? These may include other parts of the IT or security departments, including any groups doing vulnerability assessments, intrusion detection, or network monitoring. Knowing what the CSIRT will need to do can help you identify the right people to be involved in developing the procedures.

Find out if anyone else is currently performing any of the services that the CSIRT may be looking to provide. Determine if those services should stay with the current group or move to the CSIRT over some agreed-to period of time. Addressing these types of issues in the planning stages can help identify what responsibilities will need to be delineated and what information will need to be gathered.

There may also be some resources available for review that will help in your information gathering. These may include

  • organization charts for the enterprise and specific business functions
  • topologies for organizational or constituency systems and networks
  • critical system and asset inventories
  • existing disaster-recovery or business-continuity plans
  • existing guidelines for notifying the organization of a physical security breach
  • any existing incident-response plans
  • any parental or institutional regulations
  • any existing security policies and procedures

Reviewing these documents serves a dual purpose: first, to identify existing stakeholders, resources, and system owners; and second, to provide an overview of existing policies to which the CSIRT must adhere. As a bonus, these documents may contain text that can be adapted when developing CSIRT policies, procedures, or documentation. They may also include general notification lists of organizational representatives who must be contacted during emergencies. Such lists may be adapted for CSIRT work and processes.

In addition, investigate what similar organizations are doing to provide incident handling services or to organize a CSIRT. If you have contacts at these organizations, see if you can talk to them about how their team was formed. Take a look at other CSIRTs' web sites, and check their missions, charters, funding scheme, and service listing. This may give you ideas for organizing your team. Review any books or other publications about incident handling or CSIRTs. An initial list of resources can be found at the CERT CSIRT Development web page.

Attend courses or conferences that include sessions for developing incident response strategies or creating CSIRTs. These venues can provide you with opportunities to exchange ideas and interact with others in the incident response field. A good place to start may be to attend the annual FIRST conference.

Step 4: Design your CSIRT Vision

As the information gathered brings to the forefront the incident response needs of the constituency and as you build your understanding of management expectations, you can begin to identify the key components of the CSIRT. This allows you to define the vision for the CSIRT and its goals and functions. You need both management and constituent buy-in and support of these goals and functions for the CSIRT to be successful.

It is important to achieve clear agreement on the definition and expectations for the CSIRT being formed. What the CSIRT staff thinks the team will do and what the managers and general constituency think the CSIRT will do may be completely different. A number of people have the perception that a CSIRT is a "cyber cop" for an organization or constituency. While this may be true for a small number of teams, it is not generally the main focus of a CSIRT. The main focus is to prevent and respond to incidents. The vision for the CSIRT must include a clear explanation of where these CSIRT functions fit into the current organizational structure and how the CSIRT interacts with its constituency. The vision explains what benefits the CSIRT provides, what processes it enacts, who it coordinates with, and how it performs its response activities.

In creating your vision, you should

  • Identify your constituency. Who does the CSIRT support and service?
  • Define your CSIRT mission, goals, and objectives. What does the CSIRT do for the identified constituency?
  • Select the CSIRT services to provide to the constituency (or others). How does the CSIRT support its mission?
  • Determine the organizational model. How is the CSIRT structured and organized?
  • Identify required resources. What staff, equipment, and infrastructure is needed to operate the CSIRT?
  • Determine your CSIRT funding. How is the CSIRT funded for its initial startup and its long-term maintenance and growth?

Step 5: Communicate the CSIRT Vision

Communicate the CSIRT vision and operational plan to management, your constituency, and others who need to know and understand its operations. As appropriate, make adjustments to the plan based on their feedback.

Communicating your vision in advance can help identify process or organizational problems before implementation. It is a way to let people know what is coming and allow them to provide input into CSIRT development. This is a way to begin marketing the CSIRT to the constituency and gaining the needed buy-in from all organizational levels.

You may receive information that was missed or not available during the information-gathering stage. Use this information and input to make any final adjustments to the CSIRT organizational structure and processes.

Step 6: Begin CSIRT Implementation

Once management and constituency buy-in is obtained for the vision, begin the implementation:

  • Hire and train initial CSIRT staff.
  • Buy equipment and build any necessary network infrastructure to support the team.
  • Develop the initial set of CSIRT policies and procedures to support your services.
  • Define the specificiations for and build your incident-tracking system.
  • Develop incident-reporting guidelines and forms for your constituency.

A main resource you will need for your constituency is your incident-reporting guidelines. These guidelines define how your constituency interacts with your CSIRT, what constitutes an incident, what types of incidents to report, who should report an incident, why an incident should be reported, the process for reporting an incident, and the process for responding to an incident. They should be clear and understandable by the constituency being served.

The process for reporting an incident includes a detailed description of the mechanisms for submitting reports: phone, email, web form, or some other mechanism. It should also include details about what type of information should be included in the report.

The process for responding to an incident details how the CSIRT prioritizes and handles received reports. This includes how the person reporting an incident is notified of its resolution, any response timeframes that must be followed, and any other notification that occurs.

For an example of incident reporting guidelines, see the CERT/CC Incident Reporting Guidelines.

Step 7: Announce the CSIRT

When the CSIRT is operational, announce it broadly to the constituency or parent organization. It is best if this announcement comes from sponsoring management. Include the contact information and hours of operation for the CSIRT in the announcement. This is an excellent time to make available the CSIRT incident-reporting guidelines. You may also want to develop information to publicize the CSIRT, such as a simple flyer or brochure outlining the CSIRT mission and services, which can be distributed with the announcement. Some teams have held an open house or special celebration to announce the operational CSIRT.

Step 8: Evaluate the Effectiveness of the CSIRT

Once the CSIRT has been in operation for a while, management will want to determine the effectiveness of the team and use evaluation results to improve CSIRT processes and ensure that the team is meeting the needs of the constituency. The CSIRT, in conjunction with management and the constituency, will need to develop a mechanism to perform such an evaluation.

Information on effectiveness can be gathered through a variety of feedback mechanisms, including

  • benchmarking against other CSIRTs
  • general discussions with constituency representatives
  • evaluation surveys distributed to constituency members on a periodic basis
  • creation of a set of criteria or quality parameters that is then used by an audit or third party group to evaluate the team

It may be helpful to review previously collected information on the state of the constituency or organization before the implementation of the team. This information can be used as a baseline in determining the effect of the CSIRT on the constituency. Information collected for comparison may include

  • number of reported incidents
  • response time or time-to-live of an incident
  • number of incidents successfully resolved
  • information reported to the constituency about computer security issues or ongoing activity
  • attentiveness to security issues within the organization
  • preventative techniques and security practices in place

See section 2.2.4 of the Handbook for Computer Security Incident Response Teams for more information on evaluating the quality of CSIRT services.

Remember that Patience Can Be a Key

The length of time it will take to design, plan, and implement a team will vary with each organizational situation. We have seen CSIRTs become operational across a wide range of times, from two months to two years. It is important to realize that it can take about 12-18 months to work out the processes and procedures, especially for a large, distributed enterprise. After the team is operational, it can take another 12-18 months to obtain a good level of trust and comfort with your constituency. Many teams show a large growth in the number of incidents reported over their first year of operation. The longer you are in operation, the more your constituency will understand the work you are doing and the more likely that they will report to you.

Resources and More Information on Creating a CSIRT

The components discussed above are more fully discussed in the following:

These resources may provide additional insight:

  • Forming an Incident Response Team
    A paper examining the role a response team may play in the community and the issues that should be addressed both during the formation and after commencement of operations. This paper was written by a former member of the Australian Computer Emergency Response Team.

  • Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (RFC 2350)
    This is a best practices document, which recommends general requirements and behaviors that a CSIRT should follow when establishing or operating a team. It focuses on methods for letting the CSIRT constituency know about the team's services and processes.

  • Avoiding the Trial-by-Fire Approach to Security Incidents
    This article discusses the importance of having an organized and defined process for detecting and responding to computer security incidents.

  • The CERT® Guide to System and Network Security Practices
    The CERT security practices have been compiled in this book published by Addison-Wesley and available at walk-in and online bookstores. Using a practical, phased approach, the book shows administrators how to protect systems and networks against malicious and inadvertent compromise based on security incidents reported to the CERT/CC
Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

President-elect Barack Obama introduces his administration's economic team in Chicago yesterday. The team will include, from left, Timothy Geithner as Treasury secretary and Christina Romer as chair of the Council of Economic Advisers; and second from right, Lawrence Summers as director of the National Economic Council and Melody Barnes as director of the Domestic Policy Council.
President-elect Barack Obama introduces his administration's economic team in Chicago yesterday. The team will include, from left, Timothy Geithner as Treasury secretary and Christina Romer as chair of the Council of Economic Advisers; and second from right, Lawrence Summers as director of the National Economic Council and Melody Barnes as director of the Domestic Policy Council. (Pool Photo By Brian Kersey Via Getty Images

President-elect Barack Obama is assembling a deeply experienced team of top economic advisers whose key members firmly believe that limited government spending combined with free markets can create lasting prosperity

But those advisers will take over at a moment that Obama says requires just the opposite: New financial regulations and generally unthinkable levels of deficit spending are in the offing as the new administration prepares to battle the most severe economic downturn since the Great Depression.

"Right now, our economy is trapped in a vicious cycle. The turmoil on Wall Street means a new round of belt-tightening for families and businesses on Main Street, and as folks produce less and consume less, that just deepens the problems in our financial markets," Obama said in introducing his economic team at a news conference yesterday. "These extraordinary stresses on our financial system require extraordinary policy responses."

To fashion the government's response, Obama has turned to people who have been associated with more market-oriented approaches. Timothy F. Geithner, 47, Obama's choice for Treasury secretary, is president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and has been a key player in negotiations aimed at saving some of the nation's largest financial institutions.

Lawrence H. Summers, whom Obama tapped to direct his National Economic Council, served eight years in the Clinton administration, including a year and a half as Treasury secretary. He has argued that the economic boom enjoyed during much of Clinton's presidency was largely a consequence of shrinking federal deficits.

Both Summers and Geithner are proteges of Robert E. Rubin, Summers's predecessor as Treasury secretary and current Citigroup director and counselor, whose views in favor of free trade, deregulation and reduced deficits have come to define the economic approach of the Clinton years.

Christina D. Romer, an economics professor at the University of California at Berkeley who is an expert on tax policy and the nation's recovery from the Depression, has been selected to lead Obama's Council of Economic Advisers. "She has the principal required characteristic of a CEA chair: the ability to clearly explain unpleasant and somewhat complex truths about the world to powerful people without making them mad," said Bradford DeLong, another Berkeley economist.

"These are great choices," said Doug Roberts, chief investment strategist for ChannelCapitalResearch.com, an investment research firm. "Right now, economics is the key thing. He is looking for experienced technocrats, despite the fact that some come from the right or the left."

Obama plans to ask his team to implement a huge stimulus plan -- estimates run as high as $700 billion over the next two years -- that would include money to rebuild crumbling bridges, roads and mass transit systems and jump-start a "green" economy by investing in alternative energy. Obama has said those initiatives are intended not just to carry the nation through the economic downturn but also to lay the foundation for a period of growth.

Obama says the infusion is needed to create or preserve 2.5 million jobs in an economy that this year shed about half that number, causing the nation's unemployment rate to spike to its highest level in 14 years. In the past, such heavy government spending on top of already-record budget deficits would raise strong objections, probably from the key members of Obama's economic team. But in the current climate, Obama's approach has been widely embraced.

"The world has evolved, and so has this group of folks," said Larry Mishel, president of the liberal-leaning Economic Policy Institute. "Issues of where people were eight to 10 years ago, that is just history. I'll tell you why: Right now, no one is talking about accelerating globalization. Everybody is talking about national health care. Nobody is talking about balancing the budget. Everybody is talking about rebuilding the labor movement. A higher minimum wage, all sorts of things that were problematic from an earlier period, are just not there anymore."

Some liberal economists wonder privately whether the past policy preferences of Obama's top economic advisers could prove problematic. But others say Obama's choices reflect his confidence in his ability to set the direction he wants them to pursue.



Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

A  somber President-Elect Barack Obama announced his economic team, largely as expected, and laid the groundwork for a “substantial” economic stimulus package in January to “jolt this economy back into place.” He also took pains to reassure the financial markets that his administration doesn’t plan to reverse course on financial-rescue efforts in place, though he said “adjustments in the coming weeks and months” are still possible as events warrant.

Obama made clear that his economic team’s first priority is crafting an economic plan that will both revive the economy in the short term and create 2.5 million jobs over the next two years. And he made equally clear that the deficit is secondary, for the time being, despite projections by some that some the budget gap could reach $1 trillion next year.

“We’ve got to focus first on getting the economy back on track,” he said, acknowledging that “we’re going to see a substantial deficit next year, bigger than we’ve seen in some time,” though he declined to put a number on either the deficit or stimulus spending. “It’s going to be costly,” he said.

Nonetheless, perhaps to emphasize that reining in the deficit will be part of his longer-term planning, he said that on Tuesday, he would address plans to “reform how business is done in Washington, how the budgeting process works” with “meaningful cuts and sacrifices.”

Gains in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which had risen some 320 points when Obama began speaking shortly after noon Eastern time, fell back to about 225 points over Friday's close after the last question before climbing again to a gain of about 264 points over the following hour.

Although Obama said some of the current administration's efforts to address the financial crisis "didn't work exactly as [intended]," he said they had helped stabilize the financial system. "My administration will honor the public commitments made by the current administration to address the crisis," he said in his prepared remarks.

As has been his habit since winning the Nov. 4 election, Obama said the government must move "swiftly and boldly" to prevent the economic slump from becoming significantly worse, saying "we cannot hesitate or delay." But he also reinforced the prevailing assumption that little in the way of economic stimulus is likely before he is sworn in on Jan. 20, urging "the new Congress" to "work on an aggressive economic recovery plan when they convene in early January." Congress left town last week having passed only an extension of unemployment benefits, with the possibility of returning to provide aid to automakers in December.

Obama also appeared to lay the groundwork for shifting his position on some tax changes, leaving open the possibility that his administration would not seek to quickly undo tax-cuts for upper-income Americans, but rather let them expire by 2011 as they would under current law.

He also supported assistance to the auto industry, but said it must be tied to meaningful reforms by automakers to ensure they remain viable once government aid ends. "We can't just write a blank check to the auto industry," he said. "Congress did the right thing, which is saying, you guys need to come up with the right plan and come back" with it before receiving any financial assistance.

The tone of his comments to reporters at the Hyatt Chicago were grave, warning that the country is "facing an economic crisis of historic proportions." But he tempered that with faith in "the spirit of determination and optimism that has always defined us."

"Again, this won't be easy," Obama said. "There are no shortcuts or quick fixes to this crisis ... and the economy is likely to get worse before it gets better." Then, wrapping up his prepared comments, he added: "I know we can work our way out of this crisis because we've done it before."

The economic team announced at the event was largely as reported over the weekend, with New York Federal Reserve President Timothy Geithner named as Obama's Treasury nominee and former Treasury chief Lawrence Summers named as director of the National Economic Council, making him perhaps Obama's top economic adviser. (BusinessWeek.com has more on Geithner and Summers.)

However, Obama tapped Christina D. Romer, a Berkeley economist and co-director of the committee that officially declares recessions, as director of the Council of Economic Advisers. Many had expected Austan Goolsbee, a University of Chicago behavioral economist and senior campaign economic adviser, to take the position. Romer's work includes research into the U.S. recovery from the Great Depression.

Obama also named Melody C. Barnes as director of the Domestic Policy Council, which coordinates domestic initiatives across the executive branch to match presidential priorities. Barnes, who works at the progressive Center for American Progress think-tank and served as a top domestic-policy adviser to Obama's campaign, will focus in part on health-care reform, working with the administration's Health and Human Services secretary. Former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle is expected to take that post.

Heather Higgenbottom, a former legislative director for Sen. John Kerry and founder of a national-security think-tank, will be Barnes' deputy.

'Business' 카테고리의 다른 글

Research in Motion shares rise on BlackBerry sales  (0) 2008.11.25
Porsche releases details on Panamera four-door car  (0) 2008.11.25
How To Calculate Total Cost Of IT Ownership  (0) 2008.11.25
Holiday Shopping Guide  (0) 2008.11.25
Jet Set  (0) 2008.11.25
Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

(By Pablo Martinez Monsivais -- Associated Press)

A day after winning a historic victory that will make him the first black president in the nation's history, Barack Obama remained largely out of public view yesterday while his aides announced the first details of an ambitious plan for the transfer of power when he assumes office in January.

After emerging from his home in Chicago for an early workout, Obama spent most of the day ensconced in a downtown office building where he held discussions with Vice President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.; John D. Podesta, who was President Bill Clinton's chief of staff; Rep. Rahm Emanuel (Ill.); and senior campaign advisers. At his campaign headquarters nearby, aides began stripping posters from the walls and disbanding the sprawling organization that helped propel the senator from Illinois to a decisive victory over Republican John McCain on Tuesday.

Amid new indications of a weakening economy, the president-elect must now decide how to insert himself into the most pressing issues facing the nation over the next 75 days, particularly the global economic summit that President Bush will convene in Washington on Nov. 15 and a new economic stimulus package being pushed by Democrats when a lame-duck session of Congress begins days later.

Leading the Obama-Biden Transition Project are Podesta; Valerie Jarrett, a close friend of Obama's; and Pete Rouse, Obama's former Senate chief of staff. Its work can be monitored online later at www.change.gov. Obama hopes to quickly name a Treasury secretary, a decision that will set the tone for his relationship with the battered financial world, and is expected to name his chief of staff, most likely Emanuel, this week.

In remarks delivered from the Rose Garden, the current occupant of the White House called Obama's election "uplifting."

"It will be a stirring sight to watch President Obama, his wife, Michelle, and their beautiful girls step through the doors of the White House," Bush said. "I know millions of Americans will be overcome with pride at this inspiring moment that so many have awaited so long. I know Senator Obama's beloved mother and grandparents would have been thrilled to watch the child they raised ascend the steps of the Capitol and take his oath to uphold the Constitution of the greatest nation on the face of the Earth." First lady Laura Bush also called Michelle Obama to offer her congratulations.

Bush and Obama showed early signs of cooperation, with the president inviting his successor to visit the White House "as soon as possible" and promising to help make the changeover a smooth one.

With the economic summit on the horizon, a Bush administration official said the White House is "consulting closely with the president-elect's team," but could not say whether Obama or one of his representatives would be included in the meeting with 20 foreign leaders next week. "This effort will obviously straddle the two administrations, and it will be up to the president-elect as to how he would like to have input," the official said.

But in bureaucracies across the government, federal agency chiefs ordered their staffs to welcome the next president's aides and to begin preparing for an influx of appointees, a process that will place special emphasis on the departments of Treasury and Defense at a time when the nation is waging two wars and attempting to stave off further economic decline.

After weeks of speculation about who might fill the Treasury post, financial industry and Obama sources said the list includes Timothy F. Geithner, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and Lawrence H. Summers, who was Treasury secretary at the end of the Clinton administration and has been a close adviser to Obama on the economy.

Geithner has been deeply involved in the government's response to the nation's economic crisis since it began in September. While he has extensive knowledge of the financial system, he is not as well known to Obama as is Summers.

Obama could also draw from his core economic team, which includes former Treasury secretary Robert E. Rubin, former Federal Reserve chairman Paul A. Volcker, and Laura D'Andrea Tyson, who chaired Clinton's Council of Economic Advisers, the sources said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly for the president-elect.


'Politics' 카테고리의 다른 글

US reduces Iraq troops  (0) 2008.11.07
Emanuel Accepts Obama's Job offer.  (0) 2008.11.07
Obama Transition Hits Ground Running  (0) 2008.11.07
Obama Speech on Victory  (0) 2008.11.06
Hard Choices And Challenges Follow Triumph  (0) 2008.11.06
Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l