'technology'에 해당되는 글 4건

  1. 2009.02.24 Why Kindle Should Be An Open Book by CEOinIRVINE
  2. 2008.12.03 Gunmen Used Technology as A Tactical Tool by CEOinIRVINE
  3. 2008.11.16 How Smart Is Your Car? by CEOinIRVINE
  4. 2008.10.20 Technology Keeps American Families Close, Study Says by CEOinIRVINE

 

pic

SEBASTOPOL, Calif. -- The Amazon Kindle has sparked huge media interest in e-books and has seemingly jump-started the market. Its instant wireless access to hundreds of thousands of e-books and seamless one-click purchasing process would seem to give it an enormous edge over other dedicated e-book platforms. Yet I have a bold prediction: Unless Amazon embraces open e-book standards like epub, which allow readers to read books on a variety of devices, the Kindle will be gone within two or three years.

To understand why I say that, I'll need to share a bit of history.

In 1994, at an industry conference, I had an exchange with Nathan Myhrvold, then Microsoft's (nasdaq: MSFT - news - people ) chief technology officer. Myhrvold had just shown a graph that prefigured Chris Anderson's famous "long tail" graph by well over a decade. Here's what I remember him saying: "Very few documents are read by millions of people. Millions of documents--notes to yourself, your spouse, your friends--are read by only a few people. There's an entire space in the middle, though, that will be the basis of a new information economy. That's the space that we are making accessible with the Microsoft Network." (These aren't Myhrvold's exact words but the gist of his remarks as I remember them.)

You see, I'd recently been approached by the folks at the Microsoft Network. They'd identified O'Reilly as an interesting specialty publisher, just the kind of target that they hoped would embrace the Microsoft Network (or MSN, as it came to be called). The offer was simple: Pay Microsoft a $50,000 fee plus a share of any revenue, and in return it would provide this great platform for publishing, with proprietary publishing tools and file formats that would restrict our content to users of the Microsoft platform.

The only problem was we'd already embraced the alternative: We had downloaded free Web server software and published documents using an open standards format. That meant anyone could read them using a free browser.

While MSN had better tools and interfaces than the primitive World Wide Web, it was clear to us that the Web's low barriers to entry would help it to evolve more quickly, would bring in more competition and innovation, and would eventually win the day.

In fact, the year before, we'd launched The Global Network Navigator, or GNN, the world's first Web portal and the first Web site supported by advertising. To jump-start GNN, we hosted and sponsored the further development of the free Viola web browser, as a kind of demonstration project. We weren't a software company, but we wanted to show what was possible.

Sure enough, the Mosaic Web browser was launched shortly thereafter. The Web took off, and MSN, which later abandoned its proprietary architecture, never quite caught up.

For our part, we recognized that the Web was growing faster than we could, particularly as a private company uninterested in outside financing. So we sold GNN to America Online in June 1995. Big mistake. Despite telling us that they wanted to embrace the Web, they kept GNN as an "off brand," continuing to focus on their proprietary AOL platform and allowing Yahoo! (nasdaq: YHOO - news - people ) to dominate the new online information platform.

Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l
Security cameras at a train station in Mumbai, India catch gunmen wielding weapons, terrorizing travelers and shopkeepers in the station.
» LAUNCH VIDEO PLAYER

NEW DELHI, Dec. 2 -- The heavily armed attackers who set out for Mumbai by sea last week navigated with Global Positioning System equipment, according to Indian investigators and police. They carried BlackBerrys, CDs holding high-resolution satellite images like those used for Google Earth maps, and multiple cellphones with switchable SIM cards that would be hard to track. They spoke by satellite telephone. And as television channels broadcast live coverage of the young men carrying out the terrorist attack, TV sets were turned on in the hotel rooms occupied by the gunmen, eyewitnesses recalled.

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

This is terrorism in the digital age. Emerging details about the 60-hour siege of Mumbai suggest the attackers had made sophisticated use of high technology in planning and carrying out the assault that killed at least 174 people and wounded more than 300. The flood of information about the attacks -- on TV, cellphones, the Internet -- seized the attention of a terrified city, but it also was exploited by the assailants to direct their fire and cover their origins.

"Both sides used technology. The terrorists would not have been able to carry out these attacks had it not been for technology. They were not sailors, but they were able to use sophisticated GPS navigation tools and detailed maps to sail from Karachi [in Pakistan] to Mumbai," said G. Parthasarathy, an internal security expert at the Center for Policy Research in New Delhi. "Our new reality of modern life is that the public also sent text messages to relatives trapped in hotels and used the Internet to try and fight back."

During the attacks, an organization calling itself Deccan Mujaheddin asserted responsibility in an

e-mail to news outlets that was traced to a computer server in Moscow, said Praveen Swami, a terrorism expert and media commentator. The message, it was later discovered, originated in Lahore, Pakistan. Investigators have said the

e-mail was produced using Urdu-language voice-recognition software to "anonymatize" regional spellings and accents so police would be unable to identify their ethnic or geographic origins.

When the gunmen communicated with their leaders, they used satellite telephones and called voice-over-Internet-protocol phone numbers, making them harder to trace, Swami said. Then, once on the scene, they snatched cellphones from hostages and used those to stay in contact with one another.

At every point, Swami said, the gunmen used technology to gain a tactical advantage.

"This was technologically a pretty sophisticated group. They navigated their way to Mumbai using a state-of-the-art GPS system. Most of their rehearsals to familiarize themselves with Mumbai were done on high-resolution satellite maps, so they would have a good feel for the city's streets and buildings where they were going," Swami said, adding that the CDs containing maps and videos were found in some of the hotel rooms the gunmen had occupied during the siege.

The lone captured gunman, Azam Amir Kasab, told police that he was shown video footage of the targets and the satellite images before the attacks, said Deven Bharti, a deputy commissioner in the crime branch of the Mumbai police.

Mumbai police chief Hassan Gafoor, offering the first official details of how the siege was conducted, said at a news conference Tuesday: "Technology is advancing every day. We try to keep pace with it."

But several Indian analysts pointed out that the country's police are still equipped with World War II-era rifles, lagging behind the technology curve when it comes to cyber-criminals and Internet-savvy gunmen. And although there are closed-circuit TVs in the luxury hotels, some office buildings, banks, airports and rail stations, they are not nearly as pervasive as in the United States. There has been criticism that, like metal detectors, many closed-circuit cameras don't work or go unmonitored.



Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

How Smart Is Your Car?

Business 2008. 11. 16. 02:47

New technologies can help avoid accidents or even maximize fuel economy. But even the most advanced cars are only as smart as the driver.

image

In Pictures: How Smart Is Your Car?

Imagine this: Your car has a computer system that not only knows your destination but automatically maintains a steady, gas-conserving pace that's perfectly timed with the moment you reach an intersection 30 miles away, just when the light turns green.

Or, better yet, the car also has a comprehensive collision-avoidance system that detects and averts a crash even before you're aware of the impending danger, ensuring that you make it to that intersection.

This may all sound like fantasy technology, but they're just the types of ideas that participants at the 15th Annual World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems will discuss when they meet next week (Nov. 16-20) in New York. While collision-mitigation systems and "greenwave" traffic-monitoring technology are still being explored and tested, there are other cutting-edge technologies and conveniences available today that make cars smarter than ever--many of them introduced at conferences such as ITS.

In Depth: Smart Features On Today's Cars

Toyota (nyse: TM - news - people ), for its part, is presenting findings on various systems it is developing, including a brake system that alerts the driver about an upcoming intersection with a stop sign. If the driver ignores the stop sign, the system kicks in and applies brake pressure to avert an accident. At ITS, auto industry figures "learn what new safety technology is on the horizon," says Brian R. Lyons, safety and quality communications manager at Toyota Motor Sales.

Some technology is relatively simple in terms of the convenience or experience it provides but can wind up having a much more positive effect. An example of this is integrated support for portable devices, which allows drivers to connect, say, an iPod to the car's audio system and operate it through the car's controls. Sure, a feature such as this provides a better listening experience, but the real benefit is that drivers spend less time fumbling with the iPod and more time focusing on the road.

ISuppli, a California-based electronic industry analysis firm, forecasts that in 2009 more than half of all passenger cars will offer optional iPod support (it was just barely one-third in 2008). In addition, one-third of all 2009 vehicles (only 16% in 2008) will offer USB interfaces for connections with portable devices like other types of MP3 players and flash drives.






Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

Parents and children may rush through their days in different directions, but the American family is as tight-knit as in the last generation -- or more so -- because of the widespread use of cellphones and the Internet, according to a new poll.

In what was described as the first detailed survey of its kind, released today, researchers reported that family life has not been weakened, as many had worried it would, by new technology. Rather, families have compensated for the stress and hurry of modern life with cellphone calls, emails, text messages and other new forms of communication.

"There had been some fears that the internet had been taking people away from each other," said Barry Wellman, a sociology professor at the University of Toronto and one of the authors of the report, published by the Pew Internet & American Life Project. "We found just the opposite."

In the poll, 60 percent of adults said that the new technologies did not affect the closeness of their family today. Another 25 percent said cell phones and online communication made their families closer, while 11 percent noted that the technology had a negative effect.

Wellman said families appreciated the innovations because "they know what each other is doing during the day." This, he said, comports with his other research, which shows that technology "doesn't cut back on their physical presence with each other. It has not cut down on their face time."

The findings were based on a nationally representative poll of 2,252 people, which explored technology use and profiled in greater detail a group of 482 adults who were married or living together with minor children. These "traditional nuclear families" have been of particular scholarly interest, the report's authors said. They tried to examine trends in single-parent families, too, but the poll numbers were too small to be valid, they said.

Cellphones and internet use were widespread in two-parent houeholds, regardless of education, income, employment, race or ethnicity, with 94 percent saying at least one adult was online and 84 percent saying children were using the Internet.

This marks a large change in short order. Only since the turn of the century has a majority of Americans been users of the Internet and cell phones, researchers said.

When technology has changed family life, those polled said it was for the good.

Forty-seven percent of adults cited said cellphones and the internet had improved the quality of their family communication. Another 47 percent said there was no effect, and 2 percent said there there had been a decrease in quality.

The positive effect reflects family life for Randy and Ana Tillim of Germantown, who have two children. Their sons play online. Both parents rely on Blackberrys not just for work, but for the stuff of daily life. They let each other know about schedule changes, dinner plans, sick children.

"I think it brings us closer because we're able to communicate throughout the day," says Randy, 38. "I don't know what we did without it."

Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l