Many small community banks are growing frustrated about their
inability to access the government's $700 billion financial rescue
fund, nearly two months after large banks began tapping the fund for
much-needed capital.
Trade groups representing the banks
complain that the delay is putting smaller institutions at a
competitive disadvantage to publicly traded banks, more than 50 of
which have received capital injections.
"They took care of
Wall Street first, and it seems like Main Street got left behind," said
Cynthia Blankenship, vice chairwoman of Bank of the West in Irving,
Texas, which has $250 million in assets. Blankenship is also chairwoman
of the Independent Community Bankers of America.
Some
small banks, especially in areas such as California and Florida where
the housing slump hit hardest, carry troubled real estate loans and
likely would benefit from the government cash, Blankenship said.
Publicly
traded banks have been eligible since the Treasury Department began the
$250 billion capital injection program Oct. 14. The department opened
it on Nov. 17 to about 3,800 small, privately held banks. A few
publicly traded community banks already have received government money.
But
the department has yet to issue the necessary guidelines for about
3,000 additional private banks. Most of them are set up as
partnerships, with no more than 100 shareholders. They aren't able to
issue preferred shares to the government in exchange for capital
injections, as other banks can.
The Treasury Department has come under fire from members of Congress
for not ensuring that the capital injections lead to more lending. The
ICBA also argues that healthy smaller banks are more likely to use
government money to make loans than are big banks that need to shore up
their capital after writing down billions in mortgage-related losses.
Hundreds
of the banks have applied for government money, the ICBA said in a
letter Tuesday, as a precautionary step. But they can't access the
money.
As a result, the government needs to figure out what
it can receive in exchange for capital. Treasury officials say they are
working on it but that the task is technically difficult.
"I
have not seen a good answer yet," Neel Kashkari, director of Treasury's
Office of Financial Stability, said Monday at a housing conference.
The
vast majority of small banks are financially healthy, the ICBA says.
Most did not get caught up in the housing meltdown that has so damaged
Wall Street banks. But groups such as the ICBA say the rescue fund is
supposed to be available to all healthy banks.
Banks that
aren't eligible may lose out to other lenders that have received
government money, the American Bankers Association added in a letter
Dec. 5 to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson.
"They can only
watch while many of their competitors, strengthened by capital
injections from the government, seize opportunities to meet credit
needs of their communities," the ABA letter said.
Rep. Paul
Kanjorski, a Pennsylvania Democrat, urged Treasury Secretary Henry
Paulson in a letter Dec. 5 to open the program to the remaining small
banks by the end of December.
Bert Ely, a banking
consultant, said one possible solution would be for the government to
receive some type of debt instrument rather than equity.
The
Treasury Department is still struggling to hire enough staff to operate
the capital-injection program, the Government Accountability Office, an
auditing agency, said in a report earlier this month.
The
department has handed out more than $155 billion to 77 banks. Of that
sum, $115 billion has gone to the eight largest, including Bank of
America Corp., Citigroup Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Some
smaller banks that haven't yet been able to access the federal money
are particularly irked by the efforts of nonbank financial
institutions, such as life insurers and credit card companies, to get a
slice of the money. At least four life insurers, including Hartford
Financial Services Group Inc. and Genworth Financial Inc., are seeking
to buy small thrifts to become eligible for the capital injections.
"The
law was passed to help banks, and now companies are trying to get in
front by becoming a bank," said Paul Merski, chief economist for the
ICBA, which has about 5,000 members. "It's a little bit frustrating."
The
banks that aren't eligible control just a small slice of the nation's
banking assets. They make up about one-third of community banks, which
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. defines as banks with less than $1
billion in assets.
Overall, community banks hold 11 percent
of the industry's total assets, according to Sheila Bair, chairwoman of
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Still, they play a vital role in
small business and agriculture lending.
Community banks
provide 29 percent of small commercial and industrial loans, 40 percent
of small commercial real estate loans and 77 percent of small
agricultural production loans, Bair said in congressional testimony
last month. The FDIC doesn't have more precise data for the type of
banks that aren't eligible for capital injections.
The
delay in accessing the rescue money is just one aspect of the program
that has frustrated small community banks and their directors.
The
government has said the $250 billion it set aside for capital
injections is intended for healthy banks. Yet the money has been widely
referred to in press reports as a "bailout." As a result, many
well-capitalized banks worry that if they take money from Treasury,
their customers might see them as weak, Blankenship said.
Conversely,
if they don't receive any funds, customers might wonder if they were
turned down, she said. Treasury lists banks that have received money.
But it won't say which banks have applied.
Finally, the
ICBA has raised concerns about a measure governing the capital
injections that would let the Treasury Department "unilaterally amend"
the program. For example, Congress could require banks that have
received government money to do more lending, Merski said.
"That's
a bit concerning," said Dan Blanton, chief executive of Georgia Bank
& Trust, based in Augusta, Ga. "If they decide they want to change
the rules after you've taken the money ... you have to live with it."
Still,
Blanton said his bank has applied for federal funds, though he hasn't
decided yet whether to take the money if his bank is approved.
Federal
agencies and trade groups have encouraged banks of all kinds --
including those not yet technically eligible -- to apply for the
capital, to preserve the option. More than 1,000 community financial
institutions have applied, Bair said in her testimony last month.
But
some small banks that are eligible are saying no. Financial services
firm Keefe, Bruyette & Woods said in a recent report that at least
82 banks have publicly said they won't seek funds.
Evergreen
Federal Bank, based in Grants Pass, Ore., for example, has a link on
its home page that reads, "We Don't Need a Bailout."
email
print
reprint
newsletter
comments
del.icio.us
Digg It!
yahoo
Facebook
rss
