'Economy'에 해당되는 글 34건

  1. 2008.11.10 Obama's Economic Plan by CEOinIRVINE
  2. 2008.10.31 Why America Needs an Economic Strategy by CEOinIRVINE
  3. 2008.10.31 Spending drops in September while incomes slow by CEOinIRVINE
  4. 2008.10.31 Economy Shrinks in Third Quarter; Markets Start Off Strong by CEOinIRVINE
  5. 2008.10.30 McCain Links Economy, Security by CEOinIRVINE
  6. 2008.10.27 IMF pledges support for Ukraine and Hungary by CEOinIRVINE
  7. 2008.10.27 Asia stock markets resume slide on recession fears by CEOinIRVINE
  8. 2008.10.21 Bernanke Recommends Second Stimulus Package by CEOinIRVINE
  9. 2008.10.16 McCain and Obama Argue Over the Economy, Campaign Tactics by CEOinIRVINE
  10. 2008.10.10 The Other Economy: Health Care by CEOinIRVINE

Obama's Economic Plan

Business 2008. 11. 10. 02:56
pic In Pictures: Who's Shaping Obama's Economic Agenda


President-elect Barack Obama has laid out a broad plan to deal with the economic crisis, promising to enact a fiscal stimulus to promote job growth in the early days of his presidency if Congress does not get to it within the next few weeks.

"Immediately after I become president, I will confront this economic crisis head-on by taking all necessary steps to ease the credit crisis, help hardworking families, and restore growth and prosperity," Obama said, following a meeting with a 17-member brain trust of key economic advisers.

He said that if lawmakers don't act on a stimulus package quickly, "it will be the first thing I get done as president of the United States."

Speaking to a packed hotel ballroom full of reporters in Chicago, and flanked by his all-star cast of advisers, Obama outlined four broad points to dealing with the economy. First, he wants to see middle-class rescue plan that creates jobs and extends unemployment benefits. Second, he reiterated that the financial crisis is global and his administration will work to contain it.

Third, he said his administration will review the current plan to stabilize financial markets, but he also wants to see the Treasury work closely with other government agencies to make sure families stay in their homes. Finally, Obama said he will continue to move forward with a plan that will create jobs and focus on health care, clean energy and middle-class tax relief.

Obama said he has "made it a high priority" for his transition team to help the ailing auto industry, but he reminded the crowd that the U.S. only has one president at a time. He is scheduled to meet with President Bush at the White House Monday.

In Pictures: Who's Shaping Obama's Economic Agenda?

The meeting came the day the government announced unemployment has reached a 14-year high of 6.5%, with 240,000 jobs cut in October, up from 6.1% in September and higher than the worst point of the 2001-03 recession. On Thursday, major U.S. retailers reported double-digit sales declines for October.

Selecting the economic and financial advisers to steer him through an undoubtedly rocky first few months is the most important decision facing the president-elect. Of paramount importance is who will succeed Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, a Wall Street veteran who is largely responsible for the government's economic rescue package--which the Obama administration will inherit in just over two months.

The next Treasury secretary inherits a badly shaken financial system, a mandate to rein in Wall Street's excesses and hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of risky new programs ginned up by the current president to stop the bleeding.

Washington insiders say it's likely Obama will move quickly to name Cabinet nominees so that they can move through the Senate confirmation process quickly and hit the ground running in January. Obama wants to avoid the experience of President Bill Clinton, who waited until relatively late in his transition period to fill Cabinet posts. So far, Obama has made only one appointment, Rep. Rahm Emanuel. D-Ill,, a fellow Chicagoan, as his White House chief of staff.

Some of the people thought to be under consideration for the Treasury post are scheduled to attend the meeting Friday, including former Treasury secretaries Lawrence Summers and Robert Rubin, business professor and former head of the Council of Economic Advisers Laura Tyson and former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker.

Warren Buffett, the billionaire chief executive of Berkshire Hathaway (nyse: BRK - news - people ), whom bookmakers had given short odds for the Treasury post before the election, will phone in.

Conspicuously absent from the list of attendees was Timothy Geithner, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. He, along with ex-Treasury Secretary Summers, are thought to be the front runners for the job. Other names being floated, with longer odds, are JPMorgan Chase (nyse: JPM - news - people ) Chief Executive James Dimon, Merrill Lynch (nyse: MER - news - people ) executive and Wall Street veteran John Thain and New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine, a former Goldman Sachs (nyse: GS - news - people ) executive.

Obama's task in choosing a Treasury secretary is complicated by the situation on Wall Street. The government is taking a direct $250 billion stake in the U.S. banking system by injecting banks with capital. Because all of the nine major U.S. banks, as well as dozens of regional and smaller banks, are participating, appointing a banker could raise criticism that Obama is putting a fox in charge of the hen house.

The transition team has thrown a spotlight on the high-profile gathering because it wants to show that Obama has a steady hand on the economy, that he's listening to all sides and that he's seeking advice from well-respected leaders with significant experience in government and business.

Others in attendance included TIAA-CREF President and Chief Executive Roger Ferguson, who is a former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors. With his recent central bank experience (1997-2006), he can give Obama valuable insight into how financial regulation should be restructured--a goal shared by lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.

Another valuable ally in this role is William Donaldson, a former Securities and Exchange Commission chairman and former chairman of the New York Stock Exchange.

Not about to be criticized that it's listening only to Wall Street, the transition team is also seeking the input of David Bonior, a former Michigan congressman and an ally of labor groups, who has been mentioned as a potential secretary of labor. Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm can provide a voice for the troubled automakers in her state. Also slated to attend, Bill Clinton's former Labor Secretary Robert Reich, whose Labor Department implemented the Family and Medical Leave Act and the Pension Protection Act.

Of course, representatives from the business community are also on Obama's panel. They include Xerox (nyse: XRX - news - people ) boss Anne Mulcahy, Time Warner (nyse: TWX - news - people ) Chief Executive Richard Parsons and Google (nasdaq: GOOG - news - people ) CEO Eric Schmidt.

The tech community has praised Obama as the first "tech president" and, if he's seeking advice from Silicon Valley, few can offer as much insight as Schmidt.

Obama said he believes that the election of a new president can inspire confidence in the economy. "I'm confident that a new president can have an enormous impact. That's why I ran for president."




Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l
http://images.businessweek.com/story/08/370/1030_mz_porter.jpg

Gianpaolo Pagni

With the U.S. election just days away, it has never been
more important to consider what the next President must do to keep America competitive. In this time of crisis, Washington has focused on the immediate and the short term. Lost are the more basic questions we really need to worry about: What is the fundamental competitive position of the U.S. in the global economy? And what must we do to remain strong when other nations are making rapid progress?

The stark truth is that the U.S. has no long-term economic strategy—no coherent set of policies to ensure competitiveness over the long haul. Strategy embodies clear priorities, based on understanding the strengths we need to preserve and the weaknesses that threaten our prosperity the most. Strategy addresses what to do, but also what not to do. In dealing with a crisis, experience teaches us that steps to address the immediate problem must support a long-term strategy. Yet it is far from clear that we are taking the steps most important to America's long-term economic prosperity.

America's political system, especially as it has evolved in recent times, almost guarantees an absence of strategic thinking at the federal level. Government leaders react to current events piecemeal, rather than developing a strategy that unfolds over years. Congress and the Executive Branch are organized around discrete policy areas, not around the overall goal of improving competitiveness. Neither candidate has put forward anything close to a strategy; rather, each has presented a set of disconnected policy proposals with political appeal. Both parties contribute to the problem by approaching the economy with long-held ideologies and policy positions, many of which no longer fit with today's reality.

Now is the moment when the U.S. needs to break this cycle. The American economy has performed remarkably well, but our continued competitiveness has become fragile. Over the last two decades the U.S. has accounted for an incredible one-third of world economic growth. As the financial crisis hit, the rest of the American economy remained quite competitive, with many companies performing strongly in international markets. U.S. productivity growth has continued to be faster than in most other advanced economies, and exports have been the growth driver in the overall economy.

THE AGE OF ANXIETY

Yet our success has come with deep insecurities for many Americans, even before the crisis. The emergence of China and India as global players has sparked deep fears for U.S. jobs and wages, despite unemployment rates that have been low by historical standards. While the U.S. economy has been a stronger net job creator than most advanced countries, the high level of job churn (restructuring destroys about 30 million jobs per year) makes many Americans fear for their future, their pensions, and their health care. While the standard of living has risen over the last several decades for all income groups, especially when properly adjusted for family size, and while the U.S. remains the land where lower-income citizens have the best chance of moving up the economic ladder, inequality has risen. This has caused many Americans to question globalization.

To reconcile these conflicting perspectives, it's necessary to assess where America really stands. The U.S. has prospered because it has enjoyed a set of unique competitive strengths. First, the U.S. has an unparalleled environment for entrepreneurship and starting new companies.

Second, U.S. entrepreneurship has been fed by a science, technology, and innovation machine that remains by far the best in the world. While other countries increase their spending on research and development, the U.S. remains uniquely good at coaxing innovation out of its research and translating those innovations into commercial products. In 2007, American inventors registered about 80,000 patents in the U.S. patent system, where virtually all important technologies developed in any nation are patented. That's more than the rest of the world combined.





Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l
Spending drops in September while incomes slow

WASHINGTON -- Consumer spending dropped in September by the largest amount in four years, while incomes suffered because of Hurricane Ike.

The Commerce Department reported Friday that personal spending fell by 0.3 percent last month, the biggest decline since June of 2004. That followed flat readings in both July and August, contributing to the worst quarterly performance in 28 years.

Incomes showed a 0.2 percent rise in September, just half of the August increase, a slowdown that partly reflected the adverse effects of Hurricane Ike along the Gulf Coast. The storm cut into rental payments and earnings from businesses affected by the rough weather and its aftermath.

The September spending decline was slightly worse than economists expected and confirmed that the economy hit a wall in the third quarter because of the weakness in consumer spending, which accounts for two-thirds of total economic activity.




Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

Economy Shrinks in Third Quarter; Markets Start Off Strong


The U.S. economy shrank by .3 percent in the third quarter, government data released this morning shows, confirming an economic slowdown that was already showing itself through steady job losss and declining consumer sales.

The contraction was not as sharp as the .5 percent drop many analysts had predicted, and investors appeared to take comfort in that news, pushing the stock market to a strong start. After climbing more than 200 points at the open, the Dow Jones industrial average was up 86 points, or just under one percent, at 11:33 a.m. The Standard & Poor's 500 and the tech-heavy Nasdaq were both up more than one percent.

The drop in personal consumption was a particular drag on growth. Consumer spending accounts for about 70 percent of U.S. economic activity, and it dropped at a 3.1 percent annualized rate between July and September -- the biggest quarterly decline in more than 20 years.

That change alone depressed GDP by more than 2 percent.

But it was more than consumers who scaled back: Business investment fell 5.5 percent, while housing investment fell nearly 20 percent, reflecting that industry's ongoing decline.

It was in large part a jump in government spending -- at the federal, state and local levels, with a more than 18 percent annualized increase in defense spending -- that held off an even steeper decline. Overall government spending added 1.15 percent to GDP.

"Today's GDP report is weak, but it is not unexpected," White House press secretary Dana Perino said in an e-mail statement. "A number of things contributed to the slowing economy in the third quarter -- record high energy prices, housing and credit concerns, two major hurricanes, and a prolonged Boeing strike. The President is taking forceful actions to return the economy to growth and job creation by early next year. While we continue to face serious challenges, the United States remains the best place to do business, and we're positioned to bounce back."

The data released by the Commerce Department is an initial estimate of growth for the third quarter and could be changed in coming months.

Today's report marks the second time in the past year that economic growth has been negative. GDP dipped in the final quarter of 2007, crept forward slowly at the start of 2008, and surged to a 2.8 percent annualized rate in the middle of the year as a $100 billion government stimulus plan took hold.

But the impact of those tax rebates was expected to fade, and in the meantime the economy continued to shed jobs and a global credit crisis took hold.

Yesterday, the Federal Reserve unleashed its latest weapon to unlock credit by announcing a half-point cut of its key federal funds interest rate to 1 percent.

"I think that helped put a lot of the credit concerns behind us, which I think were the most acute," said Jack Ablin, senior vice president of Harris Private Bank. "Now we're faced with the economic reality and the short selling."




Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l
Republican presidential candidate John McCain swung into his final full week of campaigning with a surprise economic speech in Ohio, as running mate Sarah Palin rallied voters in Virginia.
» LAUNCH PHOTO GALLERY
Sen. John McCain yesterday sharpened his critique of Sen. Barack Obama's ability to serve as commander in chief, arguing that the Democratic nominee's economic policies would "undermine our national security."



The Arizona Republican had once planned to make defense issues the central theme of his presidential bid, but global economic turmoil has become a relentless focus of his campaign in recent weeks. McCain sought to link the two issues yesterday, arguing that, in a "Democratic-dominated Washington," national security and the economy would both suffer.

"Raising taxes and unilaterally renegotiating trade agreements as they have promised would make a bad economy even worse, and undermine our national security, even as they slash defense spending," McCain said in a speech in Tampa after meeting with his national security advisers. "At least when European nations chose the path of higher taxes and cutting defense, they knew that their security would still be guaranteed by America. But if America takes the same path, who will guarantee our security?"

The Illinois Democrat has not proposed cuts in defense spending and says he wants to continue President Bush's plan to expand the military by 92,000 soldiers and Marines. But McCain seized on a recent call for a 25 percent cut in Pentagon spending by Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) to stoke fears about what would happen if Democrats controlled both Congress and the White House.

"Even with our troops engaged in two wars, and with a force in need of rebuilding, we're getting a glimpse of what one-party rule would look like under Obama, [House Speaker Nancy] Pelosi and [Senate Majority Leader Harry] Reid," McCain said, according to prepared remarks.

The Obama campaign hit back. Retired Air Force Maj. Gen. J. Scott Gration, one of Obama's military advisers, released a statement accusing McCain of wanting to continue Bush's foreign policy while distorting Obama's defense plans.


"John McCain's desperate and dishonest attack on defense spending only makes the point that Barack Obama has been willing to stand up to some in his own party from the first day of this campaign through his commitment to increase the size of our ground forces and our investments in 21st century capabilities," Gration said.

Like McCain, Obama in recent weeks has emphasized the connection between national security and the economy, using it to sow doubts about McCain's judgment on economic issues. "We can't afford another president who ignores the fundamentals of our economy while running up record deficits to fight a war without end in Iraq," Obama told reporters last week in Richmond.

Both candidates have also made it clear that economic issues loom large on the international agenda for the next four years. Both pledge to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil. And although neither has sketched out a detailed plan for dealing with the international economic crisis, one of the early challenges facing a new administration will be how to restructure international economic institutions.

White House officials confirmed this week that neither McCain nor Obama plans to participate directly in a Nov. 15 global summit focused on the global financial crisis. But press secretary Dana Perino said yesterday that whoever wins will be "providing input" to the negotiations.

"None of this ties the next president's hand," Perino said. "But I think that what we are trying to do is do what the president asked us to do, which is do everything we can right now, in this downturn, in this cycle of our economy, to get it back to a period of growth so that the next president has the best possible starting point on January 20th."

David Rothkopf, a former trade official in the Clinton administration, said yesterday that restoring America's economic strength is critical to rebuilding U.S. influence in the world. Without such strength, the United States "doesn't have the ability to exercise soft power by writing checks for development," he said. "And it does not have the ability to underwrite hard power by funding the kind of military we're accustomed to."

Rothkopf said McCain was "disingenuous" in going after Obama for wanting to cut defense spending, saying the current level of growth at the Pentagon is unsustainable. But he also said Obama could run into trouble if he tries to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement, as the Democrat has said he would consider, or if he does not cut taxes on business, as McCain has promised. "Its going to be very hard to compete for jobs if we keep high corporate tax rates," Rothkopf said.



'Politics' 카테고리의 다른 글

Ugliest Campaign Rumors  (0) 2008.10.31
God, Country and McCain  (0) 2008.10.31
Sarah Palin  (0) 2008.10.30
Obama's ahead, polls say, but will the lead last?  (0) 2008.10.29
Polls show McCain not making up ground in Ohio  (0) 2008.10.29
Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

-- WASHINGTON AP) _ Seeking to combat a spreading global financial crisis, the International Monetary Fund said Sunday it had reached a tentative agreement to provide Ukraine with $16.5 billion in loans and announced that emergency assistance for Hungary had cleared a key hurdle.

The decisions were announced by IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who stressed that the 185-nation lending agency would act with speed to provide support for countries whose economies are being buffeted by the crisis.

Strauss-Kahn said the loan for Ukraine was designed to bolster confidence and noted that the assistance was sizable in relation to the country's borrowing rights with the IMF.

In a separate announcement, Strauss-Kahn said the IMF staff had reached broad agreement with Hungarian authorities on a reform package that the country will implement as a condition for getting its own emergency loans from the IMF. Agreement on reforms is a necessary first step in receiving IMF assistance.

Strauss-Kahn said the IMF was ready to approve a "substantial financing package" for Hungary within the next few days after all the details of the reform program are put in final form.

He said the IMF's executive board would consider loans for Hungary under expedited procedures. He did not give a figure for how large the IMF loan to Hungary would be.

In his comments on Ukraine, Strauss-Kahn said in a statement, "The IMF is moving expeditiously to help Ukraine and this program is focused on the essential upfront measures needed to maintain confidence and economic and financial stability."

The decision to aid Ukraine came two days after the IMF announced it was supplying a $2 billion loan package to Iceland, whose banking system has collapsed amid the global credit crunch.

Iceland, the first Western nation to receive IMF assistance in more than three decades, and Ukraine will both be given IMF loans in an effort to stabilize their economies.

The IMF's executive board is expected to consider in the coming week ways to streamline its emergency loan programs as it braces for a stream of petitions from countries seeking support.

President Bush and other leaders of the Group of 20 major industrial and emerging market economies will meet in Washington next month to discuss ways to overhaul the global financial architecture to better cope with the current financial crisis.

The ongoing global turmoil has resulted in the biggest upheavals on Wall Street in 70 years and prompted Congress on Oct. 3 to pass a $700 billion rescue package for the U.S. financial system. Britain and other European nations have put forward massive resources to stabilize their countries' banks.

Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

A man watches a display showing stock prices at a brokerage firm in Hong Kong Monday, Oct. 27, 2008. Asian stocks swung mostly lower in choppy trade Monday as investors braced for more volatility after last week's massive sell-off. The Hang Seng index closed the morning session down 532 points, or 4.22 percents at 12,086.38 points. (AP Photo/Vincent Yu) 


A man watches a display showing stock prices at a brokerage firm in Hong Kong Monday, Oct. 27, 2008. Asian stocks swung mostly lower in choppy trade Monday as investors braced for more volatility after last week's massive sell-off. The Hang Seng index closed the morning session down 532 points, or 4.22 percents at 12,086.38 points. (AP Photo/Vincent Yu)

HONG KONG -- Asian stock markets resumed their downward slide Monday, led by a 12 percent plunge in the Philippines, as government rescue measures failed to ease fears that a global recession would be even worse than expected.

Investors were hesitant to wade back into equities, worried a stream of economic data from the U.S. this week could bring more bearish news about the world's largest economy and trigger another round of selling, analysts said.

"Investors aren't totally convinced the worst is over yet," said Alex Tang, head of research at Core Pacific-Yamaichi in Hong Kong. "We're probably moving sideways this week and will see more volatility."

Japanese shares, after trading higher in the morning, retreated 5 percent to 7,266.83. The country's prime minister urged officials to draw up measures to calm volatile stock markets and to fend off further fallout from the crisis.

In South Korea, the Kospi skidded 3.4 percent even as the country's central bank slashed its key interest rate, by 0.75 percent, for the second time this month in a bid to boost the economy and reverse the market's recent slide.

Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index pulled back 4.2 percent and Australia's key stock measure lost 1.6 percent.

The Philippine stock market's key index plummeted 12.3 percent, to 1,713.83 points, steep losses that triggered a circuit-breaker that automatically halted trading for 15 minutes.

The biggest one-day drop since February 2007 was caused by "big fund players" withdrawing investments to get cash and meet redemptions at home, traders said.

"This is the loss of confidence in the market," said Emmanuel Soller, broker at EquitiWorld Securities Inc. "Our fundamentals were ignored; we followed the U.S. But I believe there was an overreaction by investors."

Tuesday's U.S. Federal Reserve meeting was more cause for caution. The central bank is expected to lower interest rates by at least a half-point to 1 percent, though the rate reduction is already priced into the market and unlikely to calm its restlessness.

On Friday on Wall Street, the Dow Jones industrial average fell 312.30, or 3.59 percent, to 8,378.95. By Monday morning, stock index futures were down, signaled a moderately lower open, with Dow futures down 82 points, or 1 percent, at 8,179. S&P and Nasdaq futures were also lower by about 1.5 percent.

In Japan, stocks fell despite a report that the government was considering massive capital injection into struggling banks in a bid to calm jittery financial markets.

Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told Congress Monday a fresh round of government stimulus is a good idea because there's a risk the country's economic weakness could last for some time.


Congress should consider implementing a second economic stimulus package, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said today, advising that any such program should be designed to have immediate impact and promote access to credit.

Bernanke, testifying before the House Budget Committee, hardly gave a full-throated endorsement of using government taxing and spending, an approach embraced by many Democrats. But his remarks dramatically increase the pressure on President Bush to drop his resistance to a second stimulus package.

"With the economy likely to be weak for several quarters, and with some risk of a protracted slowdown, consideration of a fiscal package by the Congress at this juncture seems appropriate," Bernanke said.

He urged that any stimulus bill be "well-targeted" so that its impact would be felt soon, get maximum bang for the buck in terms of economic impact, and not increase the long-term deficit. In prepared testimony, he did not specify what sorts of programs would or wouldn't meet those criteria, although the spending on roads, bridges and other infrastructure favored by many Democrats may not pass that test because such spending tends to occur over many years. The White House has long resisted calls for a second stimulus package, arguing until recently that the first stimulus needed more time to have full impact. That position has softened as the global financial crisis has worsened, however, and officials have now signaled a willingness to consider stimulus proposals from Congress.

The White House was measured in its response to Bernanke's remarks today. Press Secretary Dana Perino, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, said the administration was open to considering stimulus ideas, but said it would depend on the details.

Perino also declined to say whether Bush agreed with Bernanke on the need for a second stimulus, saying he would consult with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson Jr. and other senior aides before reaching a conclusion.



"We think that there's ample opportunity when Congress gets back to talk about lots of those ideas," Perino said. "What we've seen put forward so far by the leaders in Congress, the Democrats, were elements of a package that we did not think would actually stimulate the economy. So we would want to take a look at anything very carefully."

Perino added: "We've had an open mind about it, but what we are focused on right now is the urgent need to get this rescue package implemented."

Perino made the comments during a flight to Alexandria, La., for a meeting between President Bush and local business leaders to discuss the impact of the economic crisis.

On Capitol Hill, Bernanke said that any fiscal stimulus package should also aim to ease the problems in credit markets that are a major cause for the economic downturn. If Congress passes a fiscal package, Bernanke said, "it should consider including measures to help improve access to credit by consumers, home buyers, businesses and other borrowers."

In January, as Congress considered a first economic stimulus package, Bernanke gave a more full-throated endorsement, which proved significant in building momentum for the action. In February, Congress passed a bill whose prime feature was tax rebates for most Americans.

In his testimony today, Bernanke also ticked off a list of ways that the housing crunch and financial crisis are affecting the broader economy, using dour language to characterize the risks the economy faces.

"Incoming data on consumer spending, housing and business investment have all showed significant slowing over the past few months, and some key determinants of spending have worsened," Bernanke said.

But he gave little indication of whether, or how much, the Fed is inclined to cut interest rates at its Oct. 28-29 policymaking meeting, saying that "the uncertainty currently surrounding the economic outlook is unusually large."






Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama meet at Hofstra University for the third and final presidential debate. (Reuters)

After weeks of economic upheaval and a day that brought another precipitous drop in the stock market, Sens. John McCain (R) and Barack Obama (D) tonight held a final presidential debate marked by a combative series of disputes on abortion, the economic crisis and which man has run the more negative campaign.

McCain entered the night trailing in the polls and needing a clear victory to reverse the direction of his campaign, which has been hurt by the continuing focus on the troubled economy. The GOP nominee has struggled to separate himself from the policies of the unpopular Bush administration, and tonight he repeatedly made clear that he was his own man and would go in a "new direction."

"Senator Obama, I am not President Bush," McCain said, after the Democrat pointed out that he had voted for Bush's budget proposals. "If you wanted to run against President Bush, you should have run four years ago."

That forceful line did not deter Obama from his most frequent avenue of attack. "If I've occasionally mistaken your policies for George Bush's policies, it's because ... you have been a vigorous supporter of President Bush," he said.

The tone of the debate was more aggressive than the previous two, as McCain came prepared to criticize Obama on seemingly every front and put a dent in the Democrat's growing lead. Twice, McCain sarcastically noted Obama's "eloquence" and suggested that he was fudging the issues. While Obama on several occasions was forced to rebut McCain's attacks, none seemed to visibilty throw the Democrat off stride or mark a campaign-changing moment.

McCain also raised for the first time in any of the debates Obama's relationship with Weather Underground founder William Ayers, and also referenced ACORN, a community organizing group that has been accused of fraudulent voter registrations.

Having been criticized in previous sessions for not discussing the middle class, McCain sought tonight to identify with the common man, specifically "Joe the Plumber," an Ohioan whom Obama met on the campaign trail this week and who asked whether the Democrats' plans meant his taxes would go up. McCain made repeated references to the plumber in taking potshots at Obama and his economic proposals.

There was considerable speculation in the run-up to the debate over whether McCain would raise the subject of Obama's relationship with Ayers, a subject of McCain campaign ads and campaign speeches by Gov. Sarah Palin, McCain's vice presidential running mate.

Obama reiterated previous statements that he was only eight years old when Ayers engaged in domestic terrorist activities 40 years ago, that he only knew him casually, and rejected the suggestion that Ayers helped launch his political career in Illinois. (Both Obama and Ayers were members of the board of an anti-poverty group, the Woods Fund of Chicago, between 1999 and 2002. In addition, Ayers contributed $200 to Obama's re-election fund to the Illinois State Senate in April 2001. They lived within a few blocks of each other in the trendy Hyde Park section of Chicago, and moved in the same liberal-progressive circles.)

The subjects of Ayers and ACORN arose as moderator Bob Schieffer broached the issue of negative campaigning, reciting a litany of tough words each campaign had said about the other, asking whether the two men would say it to each other's face.

"It's been a tough campaign," McCain acknowledged. "If Senator Obama had responded to my urgent request" for frequent town hall meetings, "I think the tone of this campaign could have been very different."

McCain singled out Rep. John Lewis' (D-Ga.) statement associating McCain and Palin with former segregationist presidential candidate George Wallace, demanding that Obama repudiate that comment. (Lewis later tempered his initial comments).

"I do think that he inappropriately drew a comparison between what was happening there and what happened in the civil rights movement," Obama said of Lewis, after complaining about heated rhetoric at the GOP ticket's events.

As to the overall point, "I think that we expect presidential candidates to be tough," Obama said, pointing out that polls had shown Americans believe McCain has been far more negative. The two men then bickered over which had been more negative, with Obama alleging that more of McCain's ads had been negative while McCain pointed out that Obama had been spending record amounts of money on his spots. And after McCain spoke extensively about Ayers and ACORN, he concluded by saying that his campaign was really about "getting this economy back on track," prompting derisive laughter from Obama.

McCain and Obama also had their most substantive exchange of the campaign on abortion and the Supreme Court, as they were asked whether they would only appoint Justices who agreed with them on Roe v. Wade.

McCain, an abortion foe, said he "would never impose a litmus test on any nominee to the court," but that he thought Roe v. Wade "was a bad decision."

"I think it's true that we shouldn't support any litmus test," Obama agreed, though he added that he " believes that Roe v. Wade was rightly decided" and that "women are in the best position to make this decision" about abortion.

McCain argued that we must "change the culture of America. Those of us who are proudly pro-life understand that."

He then accused Obama of aligning himself with the "extreme pro-abortion" movement while in the state Senate for not supporting a bill that required the provision of life-saving treatment to infants. Obama called the charge "not true" and suggested McCain had distorted the details.

McCain sought to distance himself from the Bush administration and its policies on the first question, which asked each candidate to say why his economic proposal was better than the other's.

Americans "are angry, and they have every reason to be angry, and they want this country to go in a new direction," McCain said.

Describing his plan to have the government buy up home mortgages, McCain said, "I am convinced that ... we ought to put the homeowners first, and I'm disappointed that [Treasury] Secretary [Henry] Paulson and others have not made that their first priority."

Obama, as he did in previous debates, focused on the middle class, saying they need a "rescue package" of their own. Obama added that he agreed with McCain on the idea of buying up mortgages, but disagreed on how it should be done, saying the Republican's plan "could be a giveaway to banks."

McCain then took his first real shot at Obama, criticizing the Democrat for an incident in Ohio yesterday during which he told a plumber concerned about a tax increase that he needed to "spread the wealth around." McCain said he stood on the side of "Joe the Plumber." (The Associated Press reports that the now-famous man is Joe Wurzelbacher, an Ohioan who is looking to buy a plumbing business.)

McCain strongly reiterated his separation from the Bush administration during discussion of the second question, on spending and the deficit.

McCain said he would "have an across the board spending freeze," an idea that Obama mocked as impractical. As for specific programs he would cut, McCain cited ethanol subsidies and wasteful defense spending. Obama suggested he would cut money for the Medicare Advantage program, which sends cash to private insurers.

Schieffer next brought up the two ticket-mates, asking McCain and Obama why their vice presidential candidates were best.

Obama called Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) "one of the best public servants in this country" who has "never forgotten where he came from" and whose "consistent pattern throughout his career is to fight for the little guy."

McCain then gave tribute to Palin, his running mate. "Americans have gotten to know Sarah Palin. They know that she's a role model to women and reformers everywhere," he said. "She's a reformer through and through, and it's time we had that breath of fresh air coming into the nation's capital."

Asked whether Palin was qualified to be president, Obama demurred, saying: "Obviously that's going to be up to the American people" and that she was a talented politician.

McCain said Biden is "qualified in many respects, but I think he's been wrong on many national security issues," criticizing the Delaware Senator's "cockamamie" idea for dividing Iraq into pieces.

McCain and Obama followed with a foray into trade policy, with the two men disagreeing over whether the Colombia free trade agreement should be ratified; McCain supports it, Obama doesn't.

"I don't think there's any doubting Senator Obama wants to restrict trade and raise taxes, and the last president who tried that was Herbert Hoover," McCain said.

On health care, Obama suggested his plan was both the best way to expand coverage and cut costs. McCain accused Obama of wanting to fine small businesses -- including the aforementioned "Joe the Plumber" -- that didn't provide health insurance, while Obama said that wasn't true and that small businesses were exempt.

Obama then criticized McCain's health care plan for imposing taxes on health care benefits people receive from their employers; Mccain retorted, after again referencing the famous "Joe," that "95 percent of people in America" would be better off financially under his plan.

The faceoff at Hofstra University may have represented McCain's last and best chance to reverse the course of a contest that has slipped away from him over the last month. As bad economic news has mounted -- with titans of Wall Street disappearing and Congress passing a massive rescue package -- the Republican nominee has seen his electoral standing slip while voters migrate to the Democratic party and Obama, the candidate they increasingly prefer to handle the financial crisis.

The Dow Jones industrial average fell 733 points today, the second-largest point-drop in the Dow's century in existence, amid continued fears of a prolonged recession. That backdrop was fueled an even more intense emphasis on economic policy at a debate that was already designed to focus on domestic concerns.

Both of the first two McCain-Obama debates included extensive discussions of foreign policy. Polls taken after the first two sessions -- one at the University of Mississippi on Sept. 26, and one at Belmont University on Oct. 7 -- suggested that viewers thought Obama had won both meetings.

Before the general election debates began, friends and foes alike said Obama's primary task was to convince voters that he was up to the job of being president. McCain's goal was to convince voters of the opposite, that the Democrat was too inexperienced and too naïve to hold the nation's top job in these serious times.

Whether due to their respective debate performances or the larger issue climate, recent poll numbers suggest Obama has been largely successful and McCain hasn't. In the most recent Washington Post/ABC News survey, more respondents actually rated Obama a "safe" choice for president than did so for McCain, a 26-year Senate veteran.

The poll showed Obama leading McCain by 10 points on a national level. A New York Times/CBS News survey released today put Obama's lead at 14 points, while several other surveys have pegged the Democrat's advantage in the single digits. Perhaps more importantly, a host of polls have shown Obama tied or leading McCain in up to a dozen states won by Bush in 2004, while McCain now trails in every state that voted Democratic in the last cycle.


Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

. Barret, K. A. Dolan, S. Fitch, J. Muller and D. Whelan 10.02.08, 6:00 PM ET
Forbes Magazine dated October 27, 2008


In good times and bad roughly one in eight babies ends up in the neonatal intensive care unit of the hospital. Prematurity, respiratory distress, infections or other conditions put them there, on average, for 18 days. Pediatrix Medical Group (nyse: PDX - news - people ) of Sunrise, Fla. employs 1,200 physicians to help smallish hospitals set up and staff these units (250 and counting). In the 12 months ended June 30, net earnings rose 34% to $174 million on revenue of $991 million, up 14.5%.

Originating as the medical practice of two South Florida neonatologists in 1979, Pediatrix survived the HMO-driven churn and shakeouts, and began expanding outside of Florida to West Virginia in 1990 and now operates in 32 states. Pediatrix has benefited from trends like older parenting; women who have kids later tend to have more complicated pregnancies, premature babies and twins. But because such care is expensive and health plans are pushing moms to get prenatal care to stay out of intensive care, Pediatrix is starting to diversify into cardiology, anesthesia and obstetrics practices. Still, says company cofounder and Chief Roger Medel, "The rate of prematurity continues to increase."

Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l