'Rich'에 해당되는 글 5건

  1. 2010.02.19 IRS 400 Suggests Path To Forbes 400 by CEOinIRVINE
  2. 2009.03.07 Luxury Retailers Put On Ice by CEOinIRVINE
  3. 2008.11.01 China's 400 Richest by CEOinIRVINE
  4. 2008.10.31 Hey Buddy, Can You Spare $2 Million? (supercar) by CEOinIRVINE
  5. 2008.10.22 Study shows gap growing between rich and poor by CEOinIRVINE 2

IRS 400 Suggests Path To Forbes 400

William P. Barrett, 02.18.10, 04:20 PM EST

Want to join the Forbes 400? Build unrealized capital gains and cash them in when tax rates are lowest.


Here's a way the rich are really different: They know how to use capital gains to protect their wealth from Uncle Sam.

That's one conclusion from the Internal Revenue Service's latest look at the 400 Americans with the highest incomes. Crunching numbers back to 1992, the report found--not surprisingly--that the rich got a lot richer. But the way it happened is intriguing.

In 1992 realized capital gains (triggered by selling an asset, such as a business or stock) accounted for 33% of the adjusted gross income of the average magnate. Back then, gains were taxed at a 28% rate. But by 2007, the latest year examined, the capital gains slice of the 400's (by then much bigger) income pie had doubled to 66%. In 2007 the top federal tax rate on capital gains was just 15%, compared with 35% for ordinary income such as salaries.

A whopping $91 billion in capital gains reported by the "IRS 400" in 2007 accounted for 9.2% of all favorably taxed gains among the 143 million tax returns filed. That compares with the IRS 400's 1.59% share of total income of all Americans (a share that has tripled since 1992.)

The suggestion here is that the rich take advantage of a simple axiom of tax law: Taxes are not paid on unrealized gains (an increase in value), but only when an asset is sold and the gain realized. So the wealthy are able to develop businesses or make investments and watch them grow tax-free over many years before cashing out--at the most opportune time.

The 2003 tax cuts championed by President Bush dropped the top capital gains rate to 15%, its lowest level since 1933, providing a good window for taking gains. When the Bush tax cuts expire at the end of 2010, if Congress doesn't act, the rate will revert to 28%--its level at the end of the Clinton presidency. President Obama has proposed setting the top gains rate at 20% and the top rate on ordinary income at 39.6%.

The feds published their first IRS 400 study in 2003. At the time the agency acknowledged it was inspired by the Forbes 400 list of the wealthiest, compiled since 1982. The Forbes 400, of course, names names. Due to federal taxpayer privacy laws, the IRS doesn't and even says in a footnote that some data was fudged "to protect the confidentiality of tax return information."

But the biggest difference between the two lists is this: The IRS measures annual income, while Forbes calculates net wealth. Adjusted for inflation, from 1992 to 2007 the income of the IRS 400 jumped five-fold. The net worth of the Forbes 400: up about four-fold. That suggests that the rich may have recognized a larger (albeit still small) share of their wealth in gains as the gains rate fell.

According to the IRS, in 2007 the IRS 400 had average adjusted gross income of $345 million each (up 31% from 2006). The rich paid on average of $57 million apiece in income tax--the lowest effective rate in the 16 years measured. (The dropping rate has led Berkshire Hathaway ( BRK - news - people ) billionaire Warren Buffett to complain that his secretary pays a higher tax rate than he does.)



Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

Even ultra-rich consumers are avoiding stores like Saks and Neiman Marcus. Will they be back?


For months, aspirational shoppers spooked by job losses and a lack of credit have stayed away from luxury retailers like Saks and Neiman Marcus. But now the truly affluent, whose spending varies with asset values and business profitability, are cutting back too.

"Softness is no longer contained to weakness in aspirational consumer spending," says Fitch Ratings Director Monica Aggarwal, who tracks luxury retailers. She notes that same-store sales at Nordstrom (nyse: JWN - news - people ), which is more of an entry-level luxury chain than Neiman Marcus or Saks (nyse: SKS - news - people ), have been trending down for over a year. That the pain is now spreading up the chain is a sign that all shoppers are spending a lot of time on the sidelines.

Shares of top-line retailers were in free fall Thursday. This includes a 5.6% drop in Saks and a 9.7% drop in Nordstrom. The sell-off came after the chains announced same-store sales results for February that were far drearier than that of the broader retail sector. Comparable sales were off 26% at Saks, 15% at Nordstrom and 24% at Neiman Marcus.

Tiffany (nyse: TIF - news - people ), the upscale jeweler that reports sales quarterly, saw its shares drop more than 6%. Analysts don't expect the company to improve much on its 35% decline in same-store sales during the fourth quarter of 2008.

Why are upscale shoppers staying away, even those with big money? Chalk it up to the new psychology--conspicuous consumption is out, at least for the time being.

"If aspirational shoppers are victims of the economic forces, the affluent are being constrained by the sociological forces," says Richard Baker, CEO of Premium Knowledge Group, a market research firm that follows the luxury industry.

How long the phenomenon lasts is tough to say. Perhaps luxury shoppers will be back at the first sign of a turnaround. But Baker says his company's research suggests it will be a long time before the affluent consumer's appetite for luxury goods becomes as fierce as it was during the recent go-go years. Even the heavy discounting of recent months won't draw a shopper who isn't in the mood for a flashy handbag or watch.

The new mind-set could mean involvement with philanthropy and other causes that could (at least partially) replace material luxury as a status symbol. If Baker is right, it means a downsizing for the luxury retail sector, where fewer dollars will be spent.

Another factor: geographical concentration. Nordstrom gets 30% of its sales in California, Saks over 20% in New York and Neiman Marcus a combined 30% in California and Florida. All three areas have turned in some of the fastest growth of real estate-driven new money in recent years, and all are feeling the burst of the bubble now. All are feeling the cutbacks in tourist spending too.

Aggarwal expects free cash flow at Saks to be flat or negative this year, meaning the company will likely have to borrow against its $500 million credit facility to meet its obligations. Year-over-year comp sales declines in the low to mid-teens can be withstood for a while, but the company can't have too many more 26% drops without a liquidity crisis.

She figures the second half of 2009 will bring some improvement to the big luxury chains, but not to the point of comp sales breaking even or turning positive.

"Sales will improve, but only partially," she says. So expect negative same-store results in the low teens or high single digits right through the year.

The big question, though, is how many of those fleeing customers come back at all.




Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

China's 400 Richest

Business 2008. 11. 1. 14:52

The Year of the Rat has been a rough one for China's richest, with fortunes being dragged down amid a 60% plunge in mainland stocks and a 50% drop in Hong Kong shares in 2008. The combined net worth of the 400 richest dropped to $173 billion from $288 billion. The top 40 lost $68 billion, or 57%. The minimum net worth slipped $20 million to $180 million. We found 24 billionaires, down from a record 66 in 2007. These losses would have been greater had it not been for the renminbi's 10% appreciation against the dollar.

Net Worth: $3 billion
Age: 60

Company: East Hope Group
Industry: Agriculture, Metals
City: Shanghai


Jonathan Drake/Bloomberg News /Landov
With $120 in savings, he and 3 brothers started raising quail, chickens in 1982. Their Hope Group became one of China's largest makers of animal feed. Siblings split in 1999; Yongxing moved to Shanghai. His East Hope Group is still one of China's biggest feed producers, making 100 types; business has fared well in past year. Also owns aluminum smelters.

#2 Wong Kwong Yu (Huang Guangyu)

10.29.08, 10:00 PM ET

Net Worth: $2.7 billion
Age: 39

Company: Gome Electrical Appliances
Industry: Retailing
City: Beijing


AP Images
Heads electronics-appliance retailer Gome, forbes asia's Fab 50 member. Shares have lost three-quarters of their value since January high on fears of consumer slowdown. Wong cashed out $300 million of shares in 2008. Majority owner of 360 privately held Gome stores

#3 Yang Huiyan

10.29.08, 10:00 PM ET

Net Worth: $2.22 billion
Age: 27

Company: Country Garden
Industry: Real Estate
City: Foshan


REUTERS/China Daily
Real estate heiress whose father, Country Garden's chief, Yeung Kwok Keung, transferred holdings to her ahead of 2007 initial offering. Net worth plunged $14 billion in part due to company's ill-timed acquisitions during market peak.

#4 Liu Yonghao

10.29.08, 10:00 PM ET

Net Worth: $2.2 billion
Age: 57

Company: New Hope Group
Industry: Agriculture, Finance
City: Chengdu


AP Images
Brother of Liu Yongxing (No. 1) has run New Hope Group since 1995. Fortune hurt by declining value of stake in Minsheng Banking. Acquired stake in chemical maker Hebei Baoshuo. Donated $1.5 million to earthquake victims.

#5 Zhou Chengjian & family

10.29.08, 10:00 PM ET

Net Worth: $2 billion
Age: 43

Company: Metersbonwe
Industry: Retailing
City: Wenzhou


ImagineChina
Has created a fashion brand and retailer, Metersbonwe, for China's masses, thanks in part to savvy marketing that includes hiring pop stars as spokespeople, fashion consultants. Constantly refreshing products, launching 3,000 designs in a year. Opened first store in 1995, now has 2,200. Took company public in late August, raising $200 million, one of China's most successful public offerings of the year. Fortune includes shares held by his daughter.

#6 Zhang Jindong

10.29.08, 10:00 PM ET

Net Worth: $1.8 billion
Age: 45

Company: Suning Appliances
Industry: Retailing
City: Nanjing


AP Images
Got start in air-conditioning wholesale market in 1990 but soon shifted to retail. His Suning Appliance, rival of Wong's Gome, now has $5.5 billion in sales and is member of Fab 50. Opened 175 stores last year. Sales, profits up, but stock fell 80% owing to worries about outlook.

#7 Robin Li

10.29.08, 10:00 PM ET

Net Worth: $1.7 billion
Age: 40

Company: Baidu.com
Industry: IT
City: Beijing


AP Images
Entrepreneur behind Baidu.com, leading Chinese-language Internet search provider. Stock is down, despite strong performance including 91% gain in net profits in most recent quarter. Hired new chief technology officer, chief financial officer in 2008.

#8 Du Shuanghua

10.29.08, 10:00 PM ET

Net Worth: $1.6 billion
Age: 43

Company: Rizhao Steel
Industry: Manufacturing
City: Hengshui


ImagineChina
Heads Rizhao Steel Holding, one of China's largest private steel manufacturers. Group donated $15 million for Sichuan earthquake victims.

#9 Ma Huateng

10.29.08, 10:00 PM ET

Net Worth: $1.58 billion
Age: 37

Company: Tencent
Industry: IT
City: Shenzhen


AP Images
Runs Tencent, China's most popular provider of online chat services. Revenues up 85% in first half 2008 thanks to boost in Internet advertising ahead of Olympics and popularity of such online games as Dungeon, qq Dancer and Cross Fire.


10 Zhou Furen & family 10.29.08, 10:00 PM ET

Net Worth: $1.55 billion
Age: 57

Company: Xiyang Group
Industry: Manufacturing
City: Haicheng


ImagineChina
Former leader of a collective, he and family own $2.9 billion (sales) Xiyang Group, one of China's largest suppliers of magnetite products. Also makes steel, fertilizer.

'Business' 카테고리의 다른 글

Health care, defense poised to weather recession  (0) 2008.11.02
Computer Networking Terms You Should Know  (0) 2008.11.01
New Model Is Forged In Bank's Wreckage  (0) 2008.11.01
Samsung S2 Pebble  (0) 2008.11.01
Wal-Mart Wins Big During Downturn  (0) 2008.11.01
Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

If you have a spare $250,000 or even $2 million, think automobile. The ultra-luxury marques (at those prices the word is marque, not "brand") are expanding. Marques that once built only exotic coupes and roadsters, such as Aston Martin, Lamborghini and Porsche, are adding racy four-door models. Even the grande dames such as Rolls-Royce and Bentley are planning new entries.

The problem: Sales are falling. It may be temporary, but the ultra-luxury market, like the auto industry itself, is hurting. Even billionaires get the blues.

Why care about this sliver--barely 30,000 cars a year--in a world auto market of tens of millions? Why care when our personal portfolios, our retirement nest eggs, our home values are cascading down? For starters, this business is a barometer of the health of the overall economy.

These automobiles represent excess, but they also represent the art of the business. Few of us can afford such luxuries, but many of us fantasize about these exotic vehicles. Even today, the elegant designs from the 1920s and 1930s--the Duesenbergs, Bugattis, Pierce-Arrows and the like--still evoke strong emotions.

This market has changed. Go back a decade or two, when all these nameplates were struggling. Aston Martin had a year when sales--worldwide sales---were only 46 cars. Rolls- Royce (other-otc: RYCEY.PK - news - people ) was faded glory, left to brag about the coats of varnish on the wood trim. Lamborghini went from one owner to another--even Chrysler controlled it at one point.

Suddenly, we were in an age of super stocks, supermodels and super luxury cars. The world economy went wild, the Dow Jones industrial average eventually broke past 14,000, Manhattan apartments sold for $30 million, and some people made fortunes on things called credit default swaps, whatever they were. Millionaires became billionaires, and the super wealthy wanted curves and vehicles capable of pushing toward 200 miles per hour.

Ferdinand Piech, who ran Volkswagen (other-otc: VLKAF.PK - news - people ), bought Bentley and Lamborghini and purchased the Bugatti name in order to recreate that legendary marque. BMW ended up getting Rolls-Royce from Volkswagen. Mercedes remade Maybach as an ultra-luxury nameplate.

Now, with the world economies shaky (to say the least), it's hard to say what will happen. In the Great Depression of the 1930s, many super-luxury marques disappeared. Today, most of the nameplates are part of larger car companies and theoretically safer. Product line expansions may open markets in China, Russia and India, where two-seat sports cars have not been very popular.

Let's looks at what's new and coming.

Aston Martin
It currently makes high-performance coupes and convertibles, but next year comes the Rapide, a four-door sports car. Around 2012, look for the Lagonda, rumored to be a four-door sedan, to compete with Rolls and Bentley.

Last year, Aston Martin sold 7,300 cars, but sales this year are off 18%, so broadening the lineup seems smart. Yet the company has not forgotten sports cars: Coming late next year is the One-77, a 7.3-liter, 700-plus horsepower, 200-mph, two-door coupe with a carbon fiber chassis and an aluminum skin. Aston says it will limit production to a maximum of 77 units. The list price: 1.2 million pounds, or nearly 1.9 million U.S. dollars at current exchange rates.

Ford Motor (nyse: F - news - people ) owned Aston Martin for several years, but recently sold it to management and investors from Kuwait. As such, this is one of the few independent ultra-luxury manufacturers.

Bentley
Its volume cars are the Continentals, in coupe, sedan and convertible body styles. It is now adding "Speed" models, higher-priced derivatives with extra horsepower (600, which amounts to a net gain of about 50 horses from the standard W-12 motor).

The Bentley Arnage, which is the descendant of the big old Rolls/Bentley prior to the takeover by German automakers, is on its last tour. Bentley is planning to build 150 copies of a "Final Series" for the four-door. A replacement for the Arnage will arrive around 2010. This year, there is a new big two-door, the Brooklands, and well as the Azure drophead, but they are not part of the Final Series.

Bentley has been an enormous success: 10,000 sales last year, mostly Continentals. This year, sales are running 25% beneath last year's level.

Lamborghini
The "hot one" is the latest Gallardo, out in spring 2009, a 552-horsepower (zero to 60 in 3.7 seconds) two-passenger coupe, which lists for $198,000. Figure on spending $50,000 more by the time you're done adding on all the options.

Last year, Lamborghini sold 2,400 vehicles, including 1,000 in North America through 31 dealers. At the recent Paris Auto Show, the company stirred the crowd with its curvaceous Estoque, a four-door sports car, which the company hints it will build in three to four years.

Bugatti
Bargain shoppers take note: The U.S. price for the French-built coupe has dropped from $1.8 million to $1.5 million, as the dollar strengthens. Bugatti has delivered 180 cars since production started in early 2006 and has 70 more sold orders--a year's production capacity. But there's been some buyer hesitation recently.

The coming Bugatti model is the Veyron Grand Sport--with a removable, transparent polycarbonate roof, it's the first "convertible"--with the Bugatti quad turbo, 1001 horsepower and W-16 engine. Maximum speed is 253 mph with the top attached. The first deliveries of a planned production run of 150 units start next spring. The price is nearly 1.4 million euros, or $1.75 million U.S. at current exchange rates.

bugatti_590w.jpg
Veyron Grand Sport

Alfa Romeo
Yes, the Italians will bring in the Alfa 8C Competizione next year, a 450-horsepower, $264,000 super sexy two-door coupe. They plan to build only 500 copies, 84 of which will be exported to North America. Ten Maserati dealers will handle this vehicle. Parent company Fiat (nyse: FIA - news - people ) says Alfa will formally reenter the U.S. market with more affordable models in 2011.

Rolls-Royce
The Phantom Coupe, $350,000, is just arriving, to complement the company's sedans and convertible (starting at $420,000). Rolls' worldwide sales were 1,010 last year, 40% in the U.S. A smaller Rolls will come in 2010, too, with its price tag in the ballpark of $250,000.

Maybach
Mercedes has yet to gain much traction with its ultra-luxury entry, but is now taking orders for the Landaulet, with deliveries to start next year. There's nothing like it--part sedan and part open top (over the rear passenger section). The list price: $1.4 million.

Porsche
The four-door Panamera will come later next year. Prices, especially with plenty of options (in the Porsche (other-otc: PSEPF.PK - news - people ) fashion), will probably push past $100,000. That price point is below the ultra-luxury class, but it is symbolic of what is happening. Don't be surprised, either, to see Porsche eventually create one or more higher-priced super performance versions of the Panamera, and a hybrid, too.

panamera_590w.jpg
Porsche Panamera

Ferrari
Last but never least, Ferrari's newest offering is the California, a convertible with a front-engine V-8, 460 horsepower and a seven-speed, dual-clutch transmission. Ferrari promises that it will start U.S. deliveries next June. The European price is 179,200 euros, which translates to $225,000, but Ferrari warns the American price might be different. Who cares? Get it in red.

Will there be enough buyers for this new wave of ultra-luxury cars once they reach the market? Yes, they represent excess, but I hope they all succeed. These cars sell best when the bull is running, when business is expanding, when hopes are high. And that is good for all of us.



'Business' 카테고리의 다른 글

Hackonomics  (0) 2008.10.31
Bargains For Private Equity  (0) 2008.10.31
Justice Department investigating American Express  (0) 2008.10.31
Exxon's Production Falls as Profits Soar  (0) 2008.10.31
Why America Needs an Economic Strategy  (0) 2008.10.31
Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

The gap between rich and poor is getting bigger in the world's richest countries -- and particularly the United States -- as top earners' incomes soar while others' stagnate, according to a 30-nation report released Tuesday.

In a 20-year study of its member countries, the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development said wealthy households are not only widening the gap with the poor, but in countries such as the U.S., Canada and Germany they are also leaving middle-income earners further behind, with potentially ominous consequences if the global financial crisis sparks a long recession.

Inequality threatens the "American Dream" of social mobility -- children doing better than their parents, the poor improving their lot through hard work -- which is lower in the U.S. than countries such as Denmark, Sweden and Australia, the report found.

The two decades covered in the study -- 1985-2005 -- saw the development of global trade and the Internet, and a period of overall strong economic growth. The countries covered are mostly developed nations, especially in Europe.

The United States has the highest inequality and poverty in the OECD after Mexico and Turkey, and the gap has increased rapidly since 2000, the report said. France, meanwhile, has seen inequalities fall in the past 20 years as poorer workers are better paid.

OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria said that the study, which took three years to complete, would be useful to policymakers because it is coming out just as the world is undergoing "the worst crisis in decades."

With several OECD countries already in recession, the "key question" raised by the report is whether governments can prevent a possible drop in top earners' incomes from sparking "a second wave" hit to the lowest-income households, Martin Hirsch, France's high commissioner for fighting poverty, said at a news conference.

Also speaking at the report's presentation, Oxford University economist Anthony Atkinson noted that the widening inequality gap had coincided with a period of strong economic growth.

"What will happen if the next decade is not one of world growth but of world recession? If a rising tide didn't lift all boats, how will they be affected by an ebbing tide?" Atkinson said.

With governments around the globe announcing trillions of dollars in rescue financing to shore up banks, "I think that citizens of OECD countries are going to expect that if you can find funds to rescue banks, then governments can fund an effective unemployment insurance scheme, and they can fund employment subsidies," Atkinson said.

Atkinson said governments need to act to support employment as a response to widening inequality and faltering economies.

"If the government can take on the role of lender of last resort, then we should think about the government taking on the role of employer of last resort. Put bluntly, governments have to step up. Step up to the plate as Roosevelt did in the Great Depression," Atkinson said.

The OECD's Gurria urged governments to address the "divisive" issue of growing inequality. He said they should do more to educate the whole work force -- and not just the elite -- while helping people get jobs and increasing incomes for working families, rather than relying on social benefits.

"Greater income inequality stifles upward mobility between generations, making it harder for talented and hardworking people to get the rewards they deserve," he said in a statement. "It polarizes societies, it divides regions within countries, and it carves up the world between rich and poor."

In the United States, the richest 10 percent earn an average of $93,000 -- the highest level in the OECD. The poorest 10 percent earn an average of $5,800 -- about 20 percent lower than the OECD average.

Social mobility is lowest in countries with high inequality such as the United States, United Kingdom, and Italy, the report said.

Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l