'Thrives'에 해당되는 글 3건

  1. 2008.12.01 Facebook For Patent Trolls by CEOinIRVINE
  2. 2008.11.28 Facebook For Patent Trolls by CEOinIRVINE
  3. 2008.10.19 Zara Thrives by Breaking All the Rules by CEOinIRVINE

Is the Web finally ready for a patent-busting site?

For each Internet social network effort that thrives, there are dozens that fail to generate any interest from the surfing masses.

An early dud was BountyQuest.com, launched in 2000 with financial backing from Amazon's Jeff Bezos. The premise was simple: Posters to the site would highlight a patent they wanted to see blown out of the water, and visitors could receive up to $50,000 for presenting evidence that the patent wasn't, in fact, the first document to describe the invention in question. BountyQuest's problem was that too few got involved in the action. It fizzled within three years.

One former employee, Cheryl Milone, believes the company's business model deserves a second chance, given the rise in popularity of "crowdsourced" online projects like Wikipedia. In November, Milone, a Manhattan patent attorney, launched ArticleOnePartners.com to do more than just provide a means for prior-art mercenaries to peddle their wares. This time, Milone and a team of three intellectual property lawyers are the ones deciding which patents visitors should be harassing. And she's got two strategies for quickly turning a buck if a visitor does submit patent-busting information. (See "Meta Data: ArticleOnePartners.com").

Say a visitor sends ArticleOne evidence (an article in an obscure academic journal, for example) that calls into question the validity of one of Pfizer's Pfizer (nyse: PFE - news - people ) patents for cholesterol reducer Lipitor. Milone would make that information public on the site--and, at the same time, she could short the stock of Pfizer and go long on the stock of competitors eager to sell a generic version of Lipitor. In theory, she'd make a bundle once the industry finds out what she knows.

And if Milone doesn't see a way to make money on the markets using her newfound information? She could try selling the information to Pfizer directly--or to one of its competitors. "Our interest is first to monetize our research, to maintain our revenue stream," Milone says.

She might be on her way. Within three days of launching, ArticleOne received more than 50 prior-art submissions, some from as far away as India and the Ukraine. Milone calls visitors who submit prior art "advisors." A year from now, 5% of ArticleOne's net profit will be divvied up among the advisors, who will have been awarded points based on the amount of prior art they've coughed up. If an advisor provides prior art Milone and company think is strong enough to invalidate a patent, a $50,000 reward is automatic.

Milone wouldn't say who has funded ArticleOne, but she raised "low seven figures" from Wall Street investors and has invested some of her own money in the site. Milone insists funding hasn't come from major tech companies or wealthy patent trolls.


'Business' 카테고리의 다른 글

Like a Bad Neighbor  (0) 2008.12.01
Nice Work, If You Can Get It  (0) 2008.12.01
Where Storage Goes Next  (0) 2008.12.01
Where Venture Capital Is Still Flowing  (0) 2008.12.01
Ten Reasons For Some Economic Optimism  (0) 2008.12.01
Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

Facebook For Patent Trolls

US News 2008. 11. 28. 02:57

For each Internet social network effort that thrives, there are dozens that fail to generate any interest from the surfing masses.

An early dud was BountyQuest.com, launched in 2000 with financial backing from Amazon's Jeff Bezos. The premise was simple: Posters to the site would highlight a patent they wanted to see blown out of the water, and visitors could receive up to $50,000 for presenting evidence that the patent wasn't, in fact, the first document to describe the invention in question. BountyQuest's problem was that too few got involved in the action. It fizzled within three years.


One former employee, Cheryl Milone, believes the company's business model deserves a second chance, given the rise in popularity of "crowdsourced" online projects like Wikipedia. In November, Milone, a Manhattan patent attorney, launched ArticleOnePartners.com to do more than just provide a means for prior-art mercenaries to peddle their wares. This time, Milone and a team of three intellectual property lawyers are the ones deciding which patents visitors should be harassing. And she's got two strategies for quickly turning a buck if a visitor does submit patent-busting information. (See "Meta Data: ArticleOnePartners.com").

Say a visitor sends ArticleOne evidence (an article in an obscure academic journal, for example) that calls into question the validity of one of Pfizer's Pfizer (nyse: PFE - news - people ) patents for cholesterol reducer Lipitor. Milone would make that information public on the site--and, at the same time, she could short the stock of Pfizer and go long on the stock of competitors eager to sell a generic version of Lipitor. In theory, she'd make a bundle once the industry finds out what she knows.

And if Milone doesn't see a way to make money on the markets using her newfound information? She could try selling the information to Pfizer directly--or to one of its competitors. "Our interest is first to monetize our research, to maintain our revenue stream," Milone says.

She might be on her way. Within three days of launching, ArticleOne received more than 50 prior-art submissions, some from as far away as India and the Ukraine. Milone calls visitors who submit prior art "advisors." A year from now, 5% of ArticleOne's net profit will be divvied up among the advisors, who will have been awarded points based on the amount of prior art they've coughed up. If an advisor provides prior art Milone and company think is strong enough to invalidate a patent, a $50,000 reward is automatic.

Milone wouldn't say who has funded ArticleOne, but she raised "low seven figures" from Wall Street investors and has invested some of her own money in the site. Milone insists funding hasn't come from major tech companies or wealthy patent trolls.

Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l
http://images.businessweek.com/story/08/600/1009_mz_euroretail.jpg

A Zara store in Manhattan: Controlling the supply chain is key Jennifer S. Altman


ARTEIXO, SPAIN Many U.S. apparel retailers are choking on slow-moving inventories as consumers hold back on spending. But Spain's Inditex, whose Zara chain pioneered cheap chic, is zipping ahead. The $13.8 billion company, which is closing in on Gap (GPS) for the title of world's biggest clothing retailer, has nearly quadrupled sales, profits, and locations since 2000. This year, Inditex plans to expand by up to 640 stores. "They will weather the storms better than most of their rivals," says Michael Lewis, a supply-management professor at University of Bath's School of Management.

Inditex's secret? Besides selling relatively cheap clothes, which fit the times, the company maintains an iron grip on every link in its supply chain. That enables it to move designs from sketch pad to store rack in as little as two weeks. This "fast fashion" way of doing things has become a model for other apparel chains, such as Los Angeles-based Forever 21, Spain's Mango, and Britain's Topshop, which is set to open in New York next year.

Inditex has spent more than three decades perfecting its strategy. Along the way it has broken almost every rule in retailing. At most clothing companies, the supply chain starts with designers, who plan collections as much as a year in advance. At Inditex, Zara store managers monitor what's selling daily—and with up to 70% of their salaries coming from commission, there's a lot of incentive to get it right. They track everything from current sales trends to merchandise customers want but can't find in stores, then shoot orders to Inditex's 300 designers, who fashion what's needed instantly.

HIGHER PAY AT THE PLANT

Typically, apparel chains outsource the bulk of production to low-cost countries in Asia. Inditex produces half of its merchandise in factories in Spain, Portugal, and Morocco, keeping the manufacturing of the most fashionable items in-house while buying basics such as T-shirts from shops in Eastern Europe, Africa, and Asia. Wages are higher at Inditex—its factory workers in Spain make an average of $1,650 a month, vs. $206 in China's Guandong Province. But the company saves time and money on shipping. Also, Inditex's plants use just-in-time systems developed in cooperation with logistics experts from Toyota Motor (TM), which gives the company a level of control that would be impossible if it were entirely dependent on outsiders.

In addition, Inditex supplies every market from warehouses in Spain. Even so, it manages to get new merchandise to European stores within 24 hours, and, by flying goods via commercial airliners, to stores in the Americas and Asia in 48 hours or less.

Air shipments cost more than transporting bulk packages on ocean freighters. But Inditex can afford them. The company produces smaller batches of clothing, adding an air of exclusivity that encourages customers to shop often. As a result, the chain doesn't have to slash prices by 50%, as rivals often do, to move mass quantities of out-of-season stock. Since the chain is more attuned to the most current looks, it also can get away with charging more than, say, Gap. "If you produce what the street is already wearing, you minimize fashion risk," notes José Luis Nueno, a marketing professor at IESE Business School in Barcelona.

For rivals hoping to mimic Inditex's results, analyst Luca Solca of Sanford C. Bernstein has a bit of advice: Don't follow the Zara pattern halfheartedly. "The Inditex way is an all-or-nothing proposition that has to be fully embraced to yield results."

'Fashion' 카테고리의 다른 글

Fashion Show Paris  (0) 2008.10.20
3.1 Phillip Lim  (0) 2008.10.20
Je T'Aime...Moi Non Plus, Take Deux  (0) 2008.10.17
Tiffany & Co. : Frank Gehr Fish Pendant  (0) 2008.10.16
Missoni: Stone-embellished bracelet  (0) 2008.10.16
Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l