The cash-strapped masses may be spending less on restaurants and entertainment, but not necessarily on the quality of their sex lives--and manufacturers of sexual aids are broadening their lines to meet the demand.

To wit: Trojan now offers a condom that comes with a disposable vibrating ring. Durex, another condom maker, sells a vibrator and a line of lubricants. Even Philips Electronics (nyse: PHG - news - people ) has joined competitor Hitachi (nyse: HIT - news - people ) in the vibrator business. "We're much more open now to experimenting sexually," says Louis Friedman, chief executive of Liberator, a maker of sex toys in Atlanta. "We’re seeing countless new products being sold to a much larger audience than people realized. Even the more conservative retailers have begun to come around."

Indeed, Wal-Mart (nyse: WMT - news - people ), Walgreen (nyse: WAG - news - people ) and Target (nyse: TGT - news - people ) now peddle sexual aids, including condoms, lubricants and personal massagers. Walgreen's Web site features a "sexual wellness" tab, behind which are listed not only contraceptives and fertility tests, but also pleasure-enhancing dietary supplements, romance-themed costumes and games, massage oils and lotions, and the "Emotional Bliss Femblossom" vibrator. (Representatives from Walgreen's and Target were unavailable for comment; a Wal-Mart communications manager would say only that the chain "has a diverse mix of shoppers who visit our stores each day, and we are committed to providing customers with the selection of products they expect to find in our stores.")

In Pictures: The Mainstreaming of the Sex Industry

Poor as we all may feel lately, it seems there's at least one bright spot in having to hunker down at home. "This industry is shielded in a way," says Katy Zvolerin, director of public relations with Adam & Eve, another sex toy maker. "It does seem people use us even more heavily in bad times." (Not that there's much of a correlation between recessions and birth rates--if people have more sex during a recession, they are being careful about it.)

Chad Braverman, director of product development and licensing at Doc Johnson, takes a more sober approach to the coming months. "I don't know if I'd say our industry was 'recession-proof,'" he says. "We need to be proactive in creating a quality product that's going to sell. And there's a lot more competition than there was 20 years ago."

The sex industry traces back to 500 B.C., when traders from the Greek port of Miletus sold olisbos, an early version of the dildo. Today, the business of sex (including pornography) now runs into the tens of billions of dollars. (No official estimates are available; Wall Street analysts don't tend to track this stuff.) And while print and video sales are ebbing, as more free adult content has become available online, sales of un-reproducible sexual aids are still healthy.

Congressional aides and a senior administration official say the White House and congressional Democrats have reached an agreement in principle to speed $15 billion in government loans to struggling U.S. automakers.

The plan could see a vote as early as Wednesday. It creates a government "car czar," to be named by President George W. Bush, to oversee the bailout billions and an auto industry restructuring. The czar would have to yank back the federal money if carmakers didn't do enough to reinvent themselves.

The measure is not final and could still face obstacles from congressional Republicans, who have not approved it.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to announce the developments.

Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed

General Motors, Ford Motor and Chrysler's desperate pleas for government aid were heard. Over the weekend, legislation to provide the big three with short-term loans to get them through the new year is being drafted, following an agreement between Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and President George Bush on how to fund the rescue.

Pelosi on Friday agreed to go the White House route and use loans from the Department of Energy originally intended to insure the companies would develop green cars in the future, rather than tap Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson's $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program funds.

Mark Zandi, the chief economist of Moody's Economy.com told the Senate that an automaker's bankruptcy would be "cataclysmic." With unemployment at 6.7%, gross domestic product in a tailspin and the banking sector wobbling like a newborn doe, the White House and Congress remain understandably averse to cataclysms.

"We must first prevent additional job loss from occurring. We cannot let the auto industry collapse, which would be catastrophic to our economy," said a Friday statement from Sen. Chris Dodd, the chair of the Senate Banking Committee, signaling his support.

President Bush's remarks Friday were much the same: "It is important that Congress act next week on this plan. And it's important to make sure that taxpayers' money be paid back if any is given to the companies."

It's a much better outcome for the automakers than after their first trip to Capitol Hill, where they flew in on private jets, presented vague plans and were sent home empty-handed. But before Detroit starts cheering, they'd be smart to recall a similar situation a couple months ago. If the $700 billion bailout of the financial system holds any lesson it's this: The car companies are not out of the woods yet.

Paulson's request for $700 billion two and a half months ago is fresh in the minds of those on Capital Hill. Deny him the money, he said, and the economy would implode. Any future economic problems (which by September were inevitable) could be blamed on the inaction of Congress. Despite the threat of apocalypse, they balked for two solid weeks as volleys of constituent disapproval filled the e-mail inboxes of Congress. At one point, the House's Web server crashed from the load. He ultimately got his money, but only after a political brawl unparalleled in recent memory.

America's automakers may be even less loved than America's bankers. All of this has the strong ring of deja vu, and just as rank and file Congressmen balked at bailing out Wall Street, embarrassing party leaders and forcing a dramatic showdown on the Hill, the deal for Detroit is far from done. The challenge is not writing the legislation this weekend. It's getting it passed next week. Are Pelosi and the Democrats up to the challenge? Detroit sure hopes so.

U.S. automakers drew fresh skepticism from lawmakers Thursday in a rocky confrontation over their pleas for an expanded $34 billion rescue package they say they need to survive. Congressional analysts said one bailout plan under consideration would fall short of what the carmakers want.

With time on the current Congress running out, opposition to the bailout appeared to be as strong as last week - before Detroit's Big Three auto chiefs returned to Capitol Hill with more detailed plans on how they would spend the money.

Several lawmakers in both parties are pressing the automakers to consider a so-called "pre-packaged" bankruptcy in which they would negotiate with creditors in advance and downsize, then file for Chapter 11 protection in hopes of emerging quickly as stronger companies. The Big Three have publicly shunned the notion, saying it would kill sales by destroying customers' confidence - but executives have indicated in recent days that it might ultimately be necessary.

The executives all agreed in Thursday's hearing that a multibillion-dollar bailout deal would include a supervisory government board that could order major restructuring of the companies if deemed necessary for survival - similar to the results in many reorganizing efforts under bankruptcy law.

United Auto Worker union President Ron Gettelfinger, aligned with the industry in pressing for the aid, told senators at a Banking Committee hearing that any kind of bankruptcy, even a pre-packaged one, was not "a viable option." Gettelfinger said consumers would not buy autos from bankrupt companies, no matter the terms of the arrangement.

He also warned that in the absence of action by Congress: "I believe we could lose General Motors (nyse: GM - news - people ) by the end of this month." He said the situation was dire and time was of the essence.

The Big Three CEOs told the senators they hoped to make amends for past blunders. "We made mistakes, which we're learning from," General Motors chief executive Rick Wagoner said. Ford CEO Alan Mulally also acknowledged big mistakes, saying his company's approach once was "You build it, they will come."

General Motors, an icon of American manufacturing and the world's largest automaker, yesterday threw itself at the mercy of Congress, saying it needed $4 billion to avert a cash crisis by the end of the month and as much as $18 billion in federal loans over the next year.

GM and its U.S. rivals Chrysler and Ford all pleaded for government loans, promising in return to use the opportunity to slash costs, jettison brands, restructure their finances and speed the introduction of fuel-efficient vehicles widely considered crucial to their future.

Together the three auto giants sought at least $28 billion and as much as $38 billion in government assistance, more than the $25 billion they requested just two weeks ago. Battered by the lowest car sales in a quarter century and tight credit conditions, the companies said they needed the money just to survive the next year.

"There is no plan B," said Fritz Henderson, GM's president and chief operating officer.

It was a humble moment for the three auto behemoths, which once were synonymous with American ingenuity and industrial might. Over the past three decades, they have lost ground to more agile foreign rivals that favored smaller cars built by non-unionized labor at lower wages.

This year the combination of high fuel prices and the paralysis in the credit markets has brought the U.S. companies to the brink. Chrysler yesterday sought $7 billion by the end of the month. Ford, which is in stronger financial condition, asked Congress to set aside as much as $13 billion to help the company if the economic downturn deepens.

The companies presented their plans yesterday, a deadline set by Congress, but there was no guarantee that wary lawmakers would agree to pump taxpayer money into firms that might not be financially viable.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said yesterday that Congress would not adopt a loan package for the automakers unless the ailing giants presented "a new business model, a new business plan" that was "worthy of the support that the taxpayers will invest in it."

But she also said that "bankruptcy is not an option" and predicted that either Congress or the Bush administration would intervene to prevent a collapse of the industry. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) told reporters he expects to call the Senate back into session early next week with the aim of passing a bill by next Friday.

The chief executives of the three companies all seemed mindful of the drubbing they took two weeks ago when they sought taxpayer assistance. Excoriated for traveling by corporate jets to testify in Washington, all said they would make the 500-mile return trip by car this week for the new round of hearings. Ford and GM even said they would part with the aircraft permanently.

Ford chief executive Alan R. Mulally and GM chief executive G. Richard Wagoner Jr. also offered to cut their salaries to $1 a year if the government provides aid. Chrysler already pays chief executive Robert L. Nardelli that sum in salary. GM said it would also roll back other executives' pay.

The magnitude of the crisis, as portrayed by the companies, is daunting. Though the three companies described a dire situation two weeks ago, the situation seems even more grave now. GM said will need $12 billion by late March to keep operating. If the recession drags on, it might ultimately need up to $18 billion.

China Hacks At Rates

Beijing sharply cuts interest rates to aid the country's faltering economy.

• World Bank: China Needs Balanced Development
• Beijing's Confidence Game
• China Cooling Too Quickly

China Hacks At Rates

Parmy Olson, 11.26.08, 11:50 AM EST

Beijing sharply cut interest rates to aid the country's faltering economy.

Freddie Mac is already using taxpayer-funds to pull itself out of the red.

Government-backed mortgage lender Freddie Mac (nyse: FRE - news - people ) put in a request for $13.8 billion in aid from the Treasury Friday after it posted a larger-than-expected, $25.3 billion loss in the third quarter. The relief request is for the exact amount of negative stockholder equity, meaning liabilities that exceed assets, that the firm held at the end of the period. American taxpayers can expect to spend billions more to prop up the lender as the U.S. housing market continues to deteriorate due to falling home prices, rising unemployment, and widespread foreclosures.

This was the last straw for some investors who had stuck with Freddie Mac, even after losing their shirts when the the company was taken over by regulators. The McLean, VA firm lost 9.6%, or 7 cents, to 66 cents during morning trading in New York, leaving it at a 98.5% discount from its year-ago price.

The yawning quarterly deficit related primarly to $14.3 billion in write-downs on tax credits that can't be redeemed due to insufficient taxable income, as well as $9.1 billion in losses on investments and $6.0 billion related to troubles in the U.S. housing market, including foreclosure expenses and credit losses.

When it pulled the firm into receivorship, the U.S. government agreed to buy up to $100.0 billion in interest-bearing prefered stock investments if the mortgage giant's liabilities outweighed assets. In light of last quarter's defecit, Freddie Mac expects to have an extra $13.8 billion in hand by Nov. 29. On Monday, its government-sponsored sibling Fannie Mae (nyse: FNM - news - people ) said it would probably need some taxpayer cash too if it posted another substantial deficit in the fourth quarter. (See "Fannie Mae's Tax Hit")