'pay'에 해당되는 글 13건

  1. 2008.11.09 Tightening The Telepresence Belt by CEOinIRVINE
  2. 2008.10.30 Banks to Continue Paying Dividends by CEOinIRVINE
  3. 2008.10.24 Credit Crisis May Force Metro to Pay Millions by CEOinIRVINE 1
pic
In Pictures: Your Virtual Presence Is Requested

Sitting in one of Cisco's "telepresence" rooms, it's hard to imagine how the networking giant's high-end version of teleconferencing bills itself as a technology for tight times.

Three 65-inch high-definition screens channel images of Cisco (nasdaq: CSCO - news - people ) execs from the opposite coast with no discernible latency. An array of speakers and microphones catch and project audio in stereo, convincingly mimicking the direction of voices across a conference table. Even the rooms' lighting and wood paneling is designed to eliminate shadows and make users feel as though they're separated by just a few feet.

All those details add up to prices as high as $300,000 along with an extra $10,000 or so a month in bandwidth costs, enough to make telepresence rooms seem less like a cost-cutting measure and more like a World's Fair exhibition. But frilly as it sounds, Cisco's David Hsieh argues--with a straight face--that telepresence is designed to save your company money.

In Pictures: Your Virtual Presence Is Requested

By creating a real alternative to costly business travel, Hsieh claims that the rooms will often pay for themselves in less than a year. "It's an easy one. In a tight economy, you've got to do more and spend less," says Hsieh. "When customers look at this creatively, the key advantage is that you get that in-person meeting experience along with immediate hard-dollar travel savings."

And Cisco and other vendors' push for the expensive systems as a thrifty measure may actually be working. In September, after the crash of Lehman and AIG (nyse: AIG - news - people ), Cisco announced that it had shipped its 1,000th telepresence unit.

In its August earnings report, the company announced that its telepresence business had quintupled when measured against the year before, even as other parts of the IT sector were already starting to slump. Analysts tracking the young technology agree that despite its price tag, customers are likely to continue buying telepresence systems at a healthy rate through the coming slowdown, and that economic troubles may in some cases even accelerate the technology's adoption.

An IDC report from last March projected that by 2012, the number of deployed telepresence systems like those sold by Cisco, HP, Tandberg and Polycom (nasdaq: PLCM - news - people ) would grow from around 600 to more than 8,000 worldwide, and that revenue from those systems will increase tenfold, from $170 million to around $1.7 billion.

Though IDC now believes that growth may be dampened somewhat by the downturn, the research firm says it will remain far healthier than other IT spending on telecommunications equipment, PCs or servers.

Forrester Research (nasdaq: FORR - news - people ) analyst Henry Dewing is more bullish on high-end videoconferencing. He argues that the economic crisis may actually contribute to what he calls a "perfect storm" of factors that will boost telepresence's growth: Large companies are consolidating offices across the country, travel budgets are shriveling and, significantly, Cisco is pushing a new business model aimed at improving adoption.

Earlier this year, Cisco began offering telepresence "managed services," a pay-as-you-go plan that splits revenue with AT&T (nyse: T - news - people ) and British Telecom (BT) in the United Kingdom. Under the new model, Cisco's partners own and host a telepresence room on a company's own turf. That way, smaller customers can simply rent the equipment from one of those telecom providers for a monthly fee. That drops the cost outlay for such services from a six-figure bill for a full system to a monthly fee of as little as $10,000. Particularly during times like the current credit crisis, that option means companies avoid locking up capital--or seeing favorite projects get sliced out of the budget, says Dewing.

"Initially, companies were saying 'Holy smokes, a quarter-million dollars for a single [telepresence] room?' But a monthly fee makes a huge amount of sense when you've got problems borrowing," says Dewing. "There are a lot more rooms being sold now than anyone expected."

New York-based telepresence vendor Teliris, which sells $250,000 systems without that pay-per-month plan, is also sailing through the downturn, says chief executive Mark Trachtenberg. After two months of customers "freezing up in shock," Trachtenberg says his company has returned to selling at the same brisk rate as late year.

Among Teliris' existing customers, Trachtenberg says financial services users are spending 25% more time in telepresence meetings, with an average of twice as many users in any given meeting. The deeper economic troubles become, the more companies Trachtenberg expects to adopt his technology.

"I hate to admit it, but we do better the longer this downturn lasts," he says. "Long-term cost-cutting is integral to what we're offering."

The focus on high-end systems doesn't mean cheaper video conferencing technologies aren't also in high demand. Cisco and Hewlett Packard (nyse: HPQ - news - people ) both sell smaller versions of their telepresence units for far less, and companies like Tandberg and Polycom offer simpler videophones that provide some telepresence functions for around $1,000. Hackensack, N.J.-based Vidyo sells a software version of telepresence technology that it claims can make basic hardware run as seamlessly as a Cisco setup for around $3,000.

So why would a thrifty company spend six figures on telepresence technology? To purchase a piece of equipment that will actually replace travel instead of merely cluttering the conference room, says IDC analyst Abner Germanow. Older, more complex and clunkier videoconferencing technologies rarely were good enough to stop people from traveling for an important meeting, he says.

"You still see carts with a TV and a camera slapped on top that sit in the back of the room and no one has ever touched it," says Germanow. "If people can't figure it out, they say 'Heck with this, I'm getting on a plane.'"

But the details of modern telepresence, like low latency, high resolution,and realistic audio, mean the technology is reaching a stage where it can finally replace in-person human interaction, he says.

"You can be in a telepresence meeting for three hours, and after about an hour and a half, you forget there's this extra thing there. It largely disappears," says Germanow. "You get that solid, across-the-table meeting that lets you feel like you've actually connected with a person."





Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

U.S. banks getting more than $163 billion from the Treasury Department for new lending are on pace to pay more than half of that sum to their shareholders, with government permission, over the next three years.

The government said it was giving banks more money so they could make more loans. Dollars paid to shareholders don't serve that purpose, but Treasury officials say that suspending quarterly dividend payments would have deterred banks from participating in the voluntary program.

Critics, including economists and members of Congress, question why banks should get government money if they already have enough money to pay dividends -- or conversely, why banks that need government money are still spending so much on dividends.

"The whole purpose of the program is to increase lending and inject capital into Main Street. If the money is used for dividends, it defeats the purpose of the program," said Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), who has called for the government to require a suspension of dividend payments.

The Treasury plans to invest up to $250 billion in a wide swath of U.S. banks in return for ownership stakes, which the government will relinquish when it is repaid.

Among other restrictions, participating institutions cannot increase dividend payments without government permission. They also are barred from repurchasing stock, which increases the value of outstanding shares.

The 33 banks signed up so far plan to pay shareholders about $7 billion this quarter. Companies generally try to pay consistent dividends and, at the present pace, those dividends will consume 52 percent of the Treasury's investment over the initial three-year term.

"The terms of our capital purchase program were set to encourage participation by a broad array of financial institutions so they strengthen their financial positions," Treasury spokeswoman Michele Davis said.

The Treasury's approach contrasts with decisions by foreign governments, including Britain and Germany, to require banks that accept public investments to suspend dividend payments until the government is repaid. The U.S. government similarly required Chrysler to suspend its dividend payments as a condition of the government's 1979 bailout.

The legislation passed by Congress authorizing the Treasury's current bailout program is silent on the issue.

The first nine participants were major banks, some running short on capital, that were told by Treasury officials earlier this month to sign on to the program for the good of the country. Their major shareholders are primarily institutional investors, such as pension funds and mutual funds, although a few wealthy individuals hold large stakes, such as Warren Buffett in Wells Fargo and Prince Alwaleed bin Talal in Citigroup.

Several banks are on pace to pay more in dividends than they get from the government. The Bank of New York Mellon got $3 billion from the government on Tuesday. It will pay out $275 million to shareholders this quarter, and a projected $3.3 billion over the next three years. A spokesman declined to comment.

Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l

Metro and 30 other transit agencies across the country may have to pay billions of dollars to large banks as years-old financing deals unravel, potentially hurting service for millions of bus and train riders, transit officials said yesterday.

The problems are an unexpected consequence of the credit crisis, triggered indirectly by the collapse of American International Group, the insurance giant that U.S. taxpayers recently rescued from bankruptcy, officials said.

AIG had guaranteed deals between transit agencies and banks under which the banks made upfront payments that the agencies agreed to repay over time. But AIG's financial problems have invalidated the company's guarantees, putting the deals in technical default and allowing the banks to ask for all their money at once.

In Metro's case, the regional transit agency could face up to $400 million in payments, the system's chief financial officer, Carol Kissal, said in an interview yesterday. One bank, KBC Group of Belgium, has told Metro that it needs to pay $43 million by next week. Metro officials confirmed the details but declined to name the bank.

Transit agencies have met with the Treasury Department to request federal help. The government could back the deals instead of AIG, or it could change tax policy to help the banks and keep them from demanding payments.

Treasury spokesman Jennifer Zuccarelli declined to comment, except to say, "Treasury is aware of this situation."

Metro officials said they are prepared to fight the demands in court, forestalling an immediate effect. But they say suing one bank could impair the agency's ability to borrow money from other banks for much-needed capital improvements. Metro has said it needs more than $11 billion over 10 years to maintain, expand and improve train, bus and paratransit service. In the Washington region, more than 1.2 million trips are taken on Metrorail and Metrobus on an average weekday.

In addition to Metro, affected agencies include transit systems in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Atlanta and Chicago.

The deals in question are vestiges of an elaborate tax-avoidance plan that the IRS has since ended. It involves government agencies, such as Metro, helping private companies to avoid federal taxes.

Profit-making businesses are allowed to shelter income from taxes based on the declining value -- or depreciation -- of such equipment as rail cars. But transit agencies don't pay federal taxes, so they sold their rail cars and other equipment to banks, allowing the banks to shelter income while "their" rail cars depreciated. Then the transit agencies leased the cars back from the banks at a discount that effectively split the value of the tax break with the bank. Metro said it used the money for capital improvements, including buying rail cars.

Metro made 16 such deals, primarily with U.S. banks, between 1997 and 2003, selling 600 rail cars worth more than $1.6 billion and making $100 million.

All of the deals were approved by the Federal Transit Administration. Transit officials say they were encouraged by the government to pursue the tax deals.


Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l