Event was designed to focus on national security and foreign policy, but the economy and the bailout package lead off the questions. (Bloomberg)

McCain and Obama Duel Over Judgement, Foreign Policy

By Ben Pershing
washingtonpost.com staff writer

Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Barack Obama (D-Ill.) kicked off the first general election debate of a tight presidential contest tonight, tackling the national economic crisis and then pivoting to an increasingly heated series of exchanges over policies in Iraq and Afghanistan..

The debate, moderated by Jim Lehrer of the PBS NewsHour, was designed to focus on national security and foreign policy, but the early rounds were dominated by the country's grave economic news.

Much of the debate featured McCain on offense, lobbing charges at Obama that the Democrat has been forced to rebut. McCain repeatedly sought to cast Obama as inexperienced and unsophisticated on national security issues, saying several times that the Democrat "doesn't understand" foreign policy concepts and dynamics.

"There are some advantages to experience, and I honestly don't believe Senator Obama has the knowledge or experience, and has made the wrong judgeement in a number of areas," McCain said near the end of the debate.

Lehrer began the debate by immediately plunging into the news of the day, asking the two men: "Where do you stand on the national recovery plan?"

Obama answered first, saying "we are at a defining moment in our history," amidst two wars and a difficult "financial crisis."

Obama ticked off his priorities for the bailout package, emphasizing oversight, the need for taxpayers to potentially recoup their money, ensuring that CEOs of companies that receive aid not get "golden parachutes," and making sure that homeowners get assistance.

McCain, who has been criticized for not acknowledging quickly enough the severity of the economic situation, warned: "Have no doubt about the magnitude of this crisis."

Asked whether he would vote for the bailout plan, McCain said "I hope so" and "sure."

McCain emphasized his disdain for the current Wall Street culture, in which "greed is rewarded, excess is rewarded ... People are going to be held accountable in my administration."

Obama attempted to take a longer view, lamenting that Washington didn't craft better policies before the current crisis.

McCain went on the attack on the next question, criticizing Obama for his record of requesting more than $900 million worth of earmarks for his state and vowing to veto overstuffed spending bills. "That's a fundamental difference between me and Senator Obama. I want to cut spending. I want to keep taxes low," McCain said.

Obama fired back by criticizing both the Bush administration's tax proposals and McCain's plan, suggesting that tax cuts for the wealthy dwarfed earmarks in their relative slice of the federal budget.

"Eliminating earmarks alone is not how we are going to get the middle class back on track," Obama said.

Asked what they would have to give up as president because of the financial crisis, Obama avoided a direct answer and instead provided a laundry list of programs he would initiate and emphasize. Under further questioning, he said he might have to cut back on some of the programs he favors to reduce U.S. dependency on foreign oil. McCain vowed to cut spending overall, and continued his aggressive stance by taking a swipe at Obama for being most liberal Senator, a reference to his vote rating by National Journal. McCain suggested it is difficult to reach across the aisle "when you're that far to the left."

Shifting abroad, Lehrer asked the candidates what lessons they had learned from the Iraq war.

"The lessons of Iraq are clear, you can not have a failed strategy," McCain said, adding that he had called for a change of strategy early in the war and that the troop surge, which he supported, had been successful in putting the U.S. on a path to victory "with honor."

Obama responded by referencing his opposition to going to the war in the first place, contrasting it with McCain and Bush's advocacy in favor of the conflict.

"I wish for the sake of the country that I had been wrong and they were right, but that's not been the case," Obama said, charging that Iraq was a distraction from American efforts in Afghanistan and that al-Qaeda was resurgent as a result.

The exchanges grew more heated as the next question continued on the subject of Afghanistan. Obama said more troops were needed in the country "as quickly as possible" and that he would send "two to three additional brigades" there. Obama also called for additional pressure on Pakistan to force the government there to crack down on al Qaeda within its borders.

McCain said he would "work with the Pakistani government" and would not call for cutting aid to the country, suggesting Obama was irresponsible. Obama struck back by recalling that McCain had once threatened North Korea with "extinction" and sang a song joking about bombing Iran.

Still on offense, McCain criticized Obama for saying he would meet with the Iranian prime minister "without preconditions." Obama retorted by pointing out that his policy has been echoed by the Bush administration and several former secretaries of state, including Henry Kissinger, an advisor to McCain.

The crisis on Wall Street has intersected with the campaign trail in recent days. High-level negotiations on Capitol Hill over a massive financial rescue package brought both candidates rushing back to Washington this week along with a brief suspension of the McCain campaign and a call by the Arizonan to delay tonight's debate, which was months in the making.

Obama resisted that call, and the fate of the gathering at the University of Mississippi in Oxford was uncertain until late this morning, when McCain judged that there was "significant progress toward a bipartisan agreement" and hastily left Washington to travel south.

The nominal topic of tonight's debate, foreign policy, was thought to be Obama's biggest weakness relative to McCain, and the Republican pressed for advantage. In particular, McCain emphasized his steadfast support -- and the apparent success -- of the troop surge in Iraq and contrast that record with Obama's mixed record on the issue.

As he has repeatedly done throughout the race, Obama sought to steer the discussion further back, to make the case that he was right in initially opposing the war while McCain was as misguided as the Bush administration in backing it.

Polling has shown the race to be tight since McCain and Obama clinched their respective party nominations, but the debate came as Obama has opened a narrow lead driven by the focus on economic news -- a strong suit both for him and the Democratic party in general, according to surveys. The Washington Post/ABC News poll released Wednesday showed Obama leading McCain, 52 percent to 43 percent, among likely voters. Other surveys this week have showed a tighter race, and the RealClearPolitics average of recent national surveys gives the Democrat a four-point edge.

Having apparently lost the burst of momentum he gained after choosing Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate and staging an energetic Republican National Convention, McCain has had a turbulent two weeks leading up to tonight's debate.

Democrats pounced last week when McCain said "the fundamentals of our economy remain strong," the same day the storied financial firm Lehman Brothers collapsed and the stock market was tumbling. McCain quickly revised his public outlook on the economy, but the Obama campaign was already racing to paint him as out of touch with the concerns of average Americans.

Even after acknowledging the severity of both Wall Street and Main Street's problems, McCain still saw his poll numbers dropping and the narrative of the campaign shift in Obama's favor. Those factors may have contributed to his stunning announcement Wednesday that he was suspending his campaign, taking ads off the air and returning to Washington to involve himself in bailout negotiations.

As partisans argued over McCain's motivations and analysts debated the wisdom of his move, the Republican nominee entered the negotiating process just as a potential deal was collapsing Thursday afternoon. At McCain's urging, President Bush convened an unusual summit at the White House that included congressional leaders of both parties as well as McCain and Obama. At that session, the bailout package the administration and Hill Democrats were nearing agreement on fell apart when House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) said his members would not go along and McCain was reportedly quiet and non-commital.

While Thursday's events marked a setback, there were indications today that all sides might be gradually working toward a compromise package that would incorporate at least some of the ideas advocated by House Republicans. Both McCain and Obama will likely have a chance tonight to make their own views known in detail.

Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l


Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain and his wife leave the Ford Center after previewing the debate's location.

First Presidential Debate: What To Watch For



The first presidential debate is finally here and the candidates have likely completed their preparations. Here's what we'll be watching for in tonight's main event.

The debate that almost wasn't is now back on track for 9 p.m. ET tonight at the University of Mississippi in Oxford. John McCain and Barack Obama are on the ground in the Magnolia State -- home to the legendary Burns Strider -- and making their last minute preparations for what is almost certainly the most important moment in the general election to date.

What should you watch for in the 90 minute battle tonight? The Fix spoke with a variety of Democratic and Republican sources to get their viewer's guide to the festivities. Their thoughts -- plus a few of our own -- are below.

And, DO NOT forget that we will be live Twittering the entire night. Want to keep up with our thoughts on McCain, Obama, moderator Jim Lehrer, the cable news coverage, Catholic field hockey, songs we like and any number of other thoughts? Make sure to sign up for The Fix Twitter feed as soon as humanly possible. You can also follow our tweets tonight right here on The Fix.

Temperament: Tone matters in presidential debates -- especially in the general election. Voters don't like seeing the two men competing to lead the country engage in a series of shouting matches. McCain has shown in his political life -- and occasionally in the primary debate -- a tendency to lose his cool a bit, to allow himself to be bated into a nasty exchange when staying above the fray is required. Expect Obama to bait McCain early in tonight's debate in hopes of eliciting an angry -- and impolitic -- answer. Obama, too, has had temperament issues during the primary debates; he was often too cool, too removed from personal side of issues like the economy, health care and the war in Iraq. Obama tonight has to find a happy medium between the coolness that evokes unflattering comparisons to Adlai Stevenson and the heat that does not come naturally to him.

Foreign or Domestic: The more this supposed foreign-policy themed debate is focused on the economic crisis currently roiling Wall Street, the better for Obama. McCain has been playing defense on the issue for the last week or so and his inability to close a deal (or make a deal in the first place) during his trip to Washington makes him look even more vulnerable on the issue. Expect both candidates to channel former senator John Edwards's populist economic message, each touting himself as the person best equipped to fight for the little guy against the big corporation. Neither man is a natural populist, however, so each must be careful not to be seen as trying to pander for votes. The only thing voters dislike more than someone who disagrees with them is someone who they feel is just saying what they want to hear.

Obama and the Surge: The biggest potential pitfall for the Democratic nominee in this foreign policy debate is the contradiction between his initial opposition to the surge in Iraq and his statement earlier this month to Bill O'Reilly that the surge had "succeeded beyond our wildest dreams." For Obama, the most dangerous thing in this campaign are situations in which he appears to be doing the political thing; at the core of Obama's brand is this idea of the Illinois senator as an anti-politician -- the more he hems and haws to explain his contradictory statements, the more potential damage he does to that brand.

McCain and Iraq: The issue of Iraq has taken a backburner for nearly the entire primary and general election campaign to date, a positive development for McCain whose positioning on the issue is out of step with many Americans. McCain has been able to cast his continued support for the war -- and his early advocacy for the troop surge -- as a sign of his willingness to put what's right ahead of what's political. But, neither Obama nor moderator Jim Lehrer is likely to allow McCain to simply dismiss his break with the American public on the issue as a testament to his own patriotism. McCain must find a way to quickly and effectively deal with the issue of his initial and ongoing support for the conflict and pivot to more comfortable ground for him -- like the surge.

Insider vs. Outsider: In an election year in which nearly three quarters of voters disapprove of the job Congress is doing, it's in both candidates' interest to paint themselves as outsiders to the political process. That case is easy for Obama to make since he has spent a relatively short period of time in the nation's capital. But, judging from a memo McCain's campaign sent out earlier today -- dismissing the inability to agree on a bailout package as a "familiar spectacle" -- you can bet that he isn't prepared to cede the outsider image to Obama. Our guess? McCain will use his lack of popularity in Washington ("I wasn't voted Mr. Congeniality...") and his decision to pick Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate as evidence of his commitment to "outsider" principles.

Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l
(By Paul Sakuma -- Associated Press)

Count this as another busted myth of modern times: In family life, the husband always wields the television remote.

Lately, the wife is just as likely to be changing the channels.

A poll released yesterday by the Pew Research Center showed that 21st century couples share decision making in many aspects of American family life, and nowhere is that equity greater than in front of the household television. The poll found that 27 percent of people say women control the remote; 26 percent say that men do; and 25 percent say the couple decides together.

This change in everyday life could be one small sign of a larger social shift in the last generation, experts say.

"I think the big story over time is the rise in shared decision making," said Andrew Cherlin, a professor of sociology and public policy at Johns Hopkins University. "It's not the same as the '50s and '60s, where 'father knew best.' "

This was reflected in interviews yesterday with men and women across the region, many of whom noted that family life brings together a combination of lead-taking, choice-making and responsibilities. With much to do and little time, some things are divvied up, and others are shared, they said.

The poll includes the answers of 1,260 people who were married or living together as a couple; it has a margin of error of 3 percent. Overall, the poll reports that in 43 percent of couples, women had the most to say in a combination of four categories: decision making in finances, weekend activities, television choices and big-ticket purchases. Decision making was divided equally for 31 percent of couples, and men took the lead in 26 percent of couples.

Matt McCoy, 55, a machinist and father of two from Derwood, noted that his wife of 32 years keeps track of the checkbook, pays the bills and "did pick out everything for her kitchen." Still, he said, "other things we have decided together."

When it comes to television, though, there are differences. He likes sporting events and old movies. She likes "American Idol" and "Dateline," he said. Often, he will offer to relocate to the bedroom television when his wife wants to watch a program in the family room.


"I think we solve that problem with two televisions," McCoy said.

In Falls Church, Kristin Rodriguez, 42, said that with three young children and a part-time job as a social worker, she tends to have more say in choices of what to spend money on and where to spend weekend days as a family. Her husband works full time at an office.

When he comes home, he often defers to her and the children about television choices, though it helps that they have TiVo to record racing events and football games that he prefers. "I think he's learned to wait for us all to go to bed, and then he can watch what he wants," she said.

In prime-time hours, she handles the remote.

Pew researchers said that the television results could be affected by the fact that families have multiple televisions. They noted that a study by Nielsen Media Research showed that American homes, on average, included more televisions than people.

Cherlin, the Hopkins professor, said he was impressed that so many people who were polled said that their household decisions were jointly made, even though they were not given that choice as an answer to the poll's questions. They volunteered it.

"I'm struck by the fact that, overall, 31 percent of the people said the decision was shared, even though that option was not read to them," he said. "Clearly, there is more sharing than there used to be. There is more variation in who makes the decisions and less of a sense that the home is the man's castle."

One of the most notable results of the poll, he said, was on joint control of household finances. Among men, 37 percent said they controlled finances, with 30 percent saying their partner did and 28 percent saying finances were handled jointly. "I think that's a big change from 50 years ago," Cherlin said. Back then, he said, "some wives didn't even know what their husbands were making." Less surprising, he said, was that women took charge of weekend activities and major household purchases, many of which he said are related to home life.

Krista Atteberry, 41, a Hyattsville mother and city council member, said she sees many women take the initiative and step up as "household managers" amid the complexities of family life, but adds: "I wouldn't say decision maker. I would say decision guider."

But when it comes to television, Atteberry admits that she has turned her husband into a fan of "Project Runway." Many of her female friends also do not easily relinquish control of the remote, she said.

"I think women are just like, 'This is what I want to watch tonight. Give me a break.' "

Whatever a couple's approach to decision making, the Pew poll showed that a strong majority of people -- 80 percent -- are satisfied with their family situation.

For Pat Attridge, 51, a lawyer and father of four who lives in Ashton, that means a shared approach, mostly. But he noted, with some amusement, that there seemed to be one important omission in all of the talk about how decisions are made.

The poll, he said, "doesn't have a category for kids." In his experience, he said, "that's who call the shots."

Posted by CEOinIRVINE
l