Is it safe to embrace Microsoft's Vista operating system, or should you wait for Windows 7? Let me try to sort this out for you.

Released two years late and with many highly touted features removed, Vista has long been dogged with reports of a toxic brew of compatibility problems, sluggish performance and a plethora of annoying tics and habits. And now the Windows 7 beta has arrived, and many businesses--including bMighty parent company TechWeb--are asking themselves whether they can hang on to Windows XP until Windows 7 arrives in a year or so.

Nevertheless, there I was in a generic Office/Best Depot/Max/Buy store buying a Vista-powered HP Pavilion laptop to use as my primary home computer. Why?

Ex-Microsoft veterans are now in charge at VMware, but they insist the virtualization specialist won't become a Microsoft clone.

Big Oil is not so big anymore. Royal Dutch Shell posted a quarterly loss of $2.8 billion on Thursday, against a net profit of $8.5 billion a year earlier, as sliding oil prices and the global economic slump sapped earnings across nearly all the company's divisions. But even though 2009 will be a tough year for the industry, Shell has time--and production--on its side.

Although oil prices have fallen to around $40 per barrel, from a high of $147.50, in just six months, stripping out much of this extreme fluctuation--along with one-off items and currency effects--shows that Shell's profitability actually beat expectations. On a current-cost-of-supplies basis, free of one-off items, Shell's earnings came in at $4.2 billion, slightly higher than the $4.1 billion expected by analysts.

According to Peter Heijen, an analyst with Theodoor Gilissen, Shell's upstream business performed according to plan, with new production coming in from Australia and the Sakhalin-II project in Russia. Given that the lull in oil prices is not likely to last into 2010, and with Shell planning to make "significant investments" in the company, Heijen recommended buying the stock.

Shares of Royal Dutch Shell (nyse: RDSA - news - people ) ticked down 2 pence (3 cents), or 0.1%, to 17.74 pounds ($25.03), during morning trading in London. Rival BP (nyse: BP - news - people ) ticked up 0.2%. Both stocks outperformed the Dow Jones Euro Stoxx 50 index, which was down 1.1%, with the financial sector and mining companies depressing sentiment.

Shell also delivered a crowd-pleaser by hiking its 2008 fourth-quarter dividend by 11.0%, to 40 cents per share, as well as boosting its 2009 first-quarter dividend by 5.0%, to 42 cents per share.

Production over the year fell by 1.0%, to 3.3 million barrels of oil a day, with the lower oil price taking its toll on earnings. The resilient price of natural gas offset some of the pain: earnings from gas and power rose 55.0% over the year, to $981 million. As for Shell's downstream operations, the lack of demand for products like gasoline predictably knocked earnings down by 34.0%, on a current-cost-of-supplies basis, to $582 million.

AT&T turned in a decent fourth-quarter performance, despite being dogged by costs. Nonetheless, the weak economy will blunt the telecom firm's chances of any meaningful growth for the foreseeable future, and it still hasn't figured out how to counteract the loss in sales from those pesky landline defections.

All told, AT&T recorded a 22.6% earnings slide from the previous year's corresponding quarter, to $2.4 billion, or 41 cents per share, from $3.1 billion, or 51 cents per share. Excluding special items, earnings totaled 64 cents per share.

Between October and November 2008, AT&T (nyse: T - news - people ) beat expectations by adding 2.1 million wireless subscribers, largely because of its being the exclusive official carrier of the popular Apple (nasdaq: AAPL - news - people ) iPhone in the United States. So, yes, AT&T registered a strong quarter, but times are tough.

Though its wireless sales grew 13.2%, its landline sales 3.3%. Unlike Verizon (nyse: VZ - news - people ), AT&T still hasn't been able to quell sliding sales in the segment by selling broadband and TV services.

The San Antonio-based telecom operator expects sales to grow in the low single digit percentages. In a sign of the times, though, it also expects to cut capital spending by 10% to 15%, from the $19.7 billion it invested in 2008. That will hurt equipment vendors like Ciena (nasdaq: CIEN - news - people ) and Alcatel-Lucent (nyse: ALU - news - people ) since AT&T represents a third of spending on telecoms gear.

As in the case of Verizon, the upheaval in the financial markets is forcing AT&T to fill funding gaps. It announced Wednesday that its 2009 earnings will take a 19 cent per share hit owing to pension and retiree benefit costs. Excluding that cost, though, it expects margins to remain stable.

AP source: Ex-eBay CEO to run for Calif. governor

A person with knowledge of the discussions says former eBay Inc. chief executive Meg Whitman plans to run for governor of California.

The person was not authorized to talk publicly and spoke Monday on condition of anonymity. He says the 52-year-old Republican hopes to succeed Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2011 but is not ready to make a formal announcement.

Henry Gomez, a spokesman for Whitman, says she stepped down from the boards of eBay, Procter & Gamble Co. and DreamWorks SKG last week.

He says it was for "personal reasons and time commitments" but would not elaborate.

Schwarzenegger, also a Republican, is being forced out by term limits.

Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed

OS shoot-out: Windows vs. Mac OS X vs. Linux

by Galen Gruman, infoworld.com

Editor's Note: This article is reprinted from InfoWorld. For more IT news, subscribe to the InfoWorld Daily newsletter.

The Mac's been on a roll, both due to its highly regarded Mac OS X Leopard operating system and to an unhappy reception for Microsoft's Windows Vista. The result: For the first time in memory, the Mac's market share has hit 9.1 percent, according to IDC data, and Windows' market share has dipped below 90 percent. (Linux distributions make up the rest.)

But can either Mac OS X or Linux be more than a niche OS? After all, Windows runs practically everything, from widely used productivity apps such as spreadsheets to highly niche applications such as chemical modeling. Mac OS X and Linux simply don't have the app base that Windows does. Of course, the fact you can run Windows on a Mac or Linux system, thanks to Parallels Desktop and EMC VMware Fusion, lets you have your cake and eat it too.

[ Find out the deployment secrets of Vista adopters and see how the beta Windows 7 performs | Follow InfoWorld's guides on switching to Mac OS X and switching to Linux. ]

For some users -- often technically savvy people such as engineers, consultants, designers, and CTOs -- it is clearly an option that already works quite well. In the past year, running Mac OS X or Linux as your default OS has been made easier by the capability to run Windows in a virtual machine, giving you access to both Windows-only applications and Web sites that rely on Microsoft's Internet Explorer-only ActiveX technology. But in a business environment, switching to a Mac or Linux PC may not be quite as easy.

The Windows option

Despite the increasing adoption of alternatives to Windows, the Microsoft OS remains the standard choice for the vast majority of businesses. After all, it's been their standard for nearly two decades; they know it, have become dependent on it, and understand its capabilities and limitations. Plus, it's backed by a company that puts a lot of resources into maintaining, supporting, and enhancing the OS for its very wide user base -- and has a huge third-party support system, from vendors to consultants.

For most businesses, considering something other than Windows is not even a question; their concern is when to shift to a new version of Windows. Still, as users (re)discover the Mac and questions over Windows' long-term resource requirements hang in the air, some are considering alternatives to, or at least supplements for, Windows in the form of Mac OS X and Linux.

The Mac OS X option

Of the plausible alternatives to Windows, Apple's Mac OS X has the largest market share and history. InfoWorld chief technologist Tom Yager has written that the latest version of the Mac OS, Leopard (10.5), is simply the best operating system available. And Macs are indeed popping up more frequently even within IT circles -- I've seen more MacBook Pros in the hands of CTOs and IT execs at conferences in the past year more than ever before. Although there are no real numbers on just the business adoption of Macs, it's clear that Apple is in growth mode, gaining an increasing proportion of all new computer sales for more than a year now.

Many businesses have already adopted the Mac as a standard platform, discovering that the hardware is typically better designed than equivalent Windows systems for the same price, that security risks are lower, and that there are more enterprise-quality management tools than they expected. InfoWorld has chronicled how to make the switch to Mac OS X.

The drive for Mac adoption often comes from users, not IT. InfoWorld's Yager has chronicled the adventures of one PC user who switched to the Mac OS, showing that for an individual, the conversion was ultimately a rewarding one.

A key tool for any Mac OS X switcher is a virtual machine to run Windows for those apps and Web sites that require it. Both Parallels Desktop 3.0 and VMware's Fusion software will do the trick, as InfoWorld's comparative review has shown.

Although Macs are compatible with most typical hardware, such as monitors and drives, fitting a Mac into an enterprise's management systems and ERP applications can be a different story. Yager's Enterprise Mac blog and the Mac Enterprise user group both provide advice on managing Macs in a traditional IT environment.

The Linux option

The more technically inclined may be attracted to Linux, the most popular form of desktop Unix. Linux desktops typically are challenged by limited hardware compatibility (due to lack of drivers), limited application options, and user interfaces that require active participation to get work done, which tends to keep Linux away from the general user population. Still, it's possible to do, and InfoWorld has chronicled how to make the switch to Linux.

But those who work with a Linux server all day may find that using it on the desktop as well actually makes their lives easier.

Just as Mac users need occasional access to Windows, so do Linux users. Because Linux distributions run on Windows-compatible hardware, it's straightforward to use desktop virtualization software, such as Parallels Workstation, Sun's (formerly Innotek's) VirtualBox, and VMware's Workstation software, to provide access to both environments.

Although some enterprises have committed to wide Linux deployment -- such as automaker Peugeot Citroen's plans to install 20,000 Novell Suse Linux desktops -- most have left Linux to the engineering and development staff.

InfoWorld Enterprise Desktop blogger Randall Kennedy argues that desktop Linux is doomed to remain a tiny niche OS, given the Linux community's lack of interest in providing a UI that regular people could use. Kennedy tried to spend a week working on nothing but the Ubuntu distribution of Linux but gave up on the fifth day.

But Kennedy's take isn't the last word on desktop Linux. Frequent InfoWorld contributor Neil McAllister put together a special report on how to move from Windows to Linux, concluding that the effort was not as hard as you might think.

Who's right? As with any platform choice, they both may be. A one-size-fits-all approach may be unrealistic. And that likely explains why many businesses will have a mix, dominated by Windows XP today (and perhaps Windows 7 in a few years) but not exclusively tied to Microsoft's OS.

Apple will launch an upgrade to its low-end desktop, the Mac Mini, at January's Macworld Expo in San Francisco, according to an Apple corporate employee who contacted Wired.com.

The source, who wished to remain anonymous (to keep his job), could not disclose details about the Mac Mini other than its upcoming announcement at Macworld Expo, which begins Jan. 5. That's where CEO Steve Jobs traditionally launches major products during his famous keynotes (assuming he does indeed show up).

An upgrade to the Mac Mini is long overdue: The product hasn't seen a refresh since August 2007, and Apple computers normally have a life cycle of roughly six months. This long period of silence led many to speculate that Apple was going to drop the Mac Mini from its product line. However, Apple has shown no signs of discontinuing the product. It's also noteworthy that although Apple has been quiet about Mac Mini sales numbers, the diminutive desktop appears to be selling quite well. For example, the Mac Mini has been among the top 5 of Amazon's best selling desktops; it currently stands at No. 3.   

Though our source confirms there will be a new Mac Mini announced January, it's unlikely this will be Apple's big product launch at the show. (Last year's major Macworld announcement was the MacBook Air; the year before that was the iPhone.) However, speculation about Apple's next major Macworld launch has been surprisingly quiet, so word about the Mac Mini is the most we have so far.

Here's what Wired.com believes will be in the next Mac Mini, based on trends seen in Apple's latest products:

• Similar to the MacBooks, the Mac Mini will sport a silver enclosure composed of a block of aluminum.
• Some internal parts will be PVC-free, and combined with its size and low power requirements, Apple will tout this as the "greenest Mac ever."
• For video output, the Mac Mini will use the DRM-crippled DisplayPort for connectivity, which Apple is offering to manufacturers for a no-fee license.
• It'll have a CD-DVD slot loader (i.e. Super Drive). There will be no Blu-ray player, because Steve Jobs believes the format is a "bag of hurt."
• It'll ship with 2 GB of RAM, expandable to 4 GB — up from the current 1 GB, expandable to 2 GB. (The aluminum case should make expanding RAM easier than in the original Mini.)
• It'll ship with at least a 160-GB hard drive.
• The Mac Mini will come in two options with different processor speeds: a 2.0-GHz Core 2 Duo and a 2.3-GHz Core 2 Duo (up from 1.83 GHz and 2.0 GHz).
• Like the higher-end MacBook and MacBook Pro, the 2.3-GHz Mac Mini will ship with an Nvidia video card, making this higher-end model a decent gaming device.
• The 2.0-GHz Mac Mini will ship with an Intel video card, perhaps the GMA X3100 graphics card found in the low-end, white MacBook.
• The slower model will cost $500, and the faster model will cost $700 ($100 less than the current Mac Minis), in light of the recession.

That's as much as we're going to speculate right now. Have anything you'd like to add?

Wal-Mart iPhone training materials
Boy Genius Report first broke the story back in October that Apple would begin selling the iPhone at Wal-Marts. The actual date of release appears to be December 28th. Wal-Mart employees are already receiving training on iPhone activation (see photo above). Today, a new report from Boy Genius Report claims that Apple may be reintroducing the 4GB iPhone to be sold at Wal-Mart for only $99 with a two year contract. The site is not entirely confident about the report, so suggests this possibility should be taken with caution.

When Apple originally introduced the iPhone, it came in 4GB and 8GB models. Only a couple of months later, Apple discontinued the 4GB model altogether and dropped the price of the 8GB model. Apple currently sells an 8GB ($199) and 16GB ($299) iPhone with 2 year contract. Aggressive $99 pricing for an entry level iPhone would correlate with comments made by Steve Jobs in October. Jobs said that they needed to continue to be aware of a possible "price umbrella" below the iPhone that competitors may take advantage of. Analysts have suggested that Apple could feasibly sell the iPhone for $99.

Google, Apple, Microsoft sued over file preview

by Robert McMillan, IDG News Service

A small Indiana company has sued tech heavyweights Microsoft, Apple, and Google, claiming that it holds the patent on a common file preview feature used by browsers and operating systems to show users small snapshots of the files before they are opened.

Cygnus Systems sued the three companies on Wednesday saying that they infringed on its patent with products such as Windows Vista, Internet Explorer 8 and Google Chrome, which allow users to view preview images of documents on the computer. Mac OS X, the iPhone and Safari also infringe, the company said in court filings. Apple uses this technology in its Finder and Cover Flow Mac OS X features, the filings state.

While Cygnus has sued three very high profile companies, there may not be the only vendors in Cygnus’s sites. “They were a logical starting place for us,” said Matt McAndrews, a partner with the Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, law firm, which is representing Cygnus. “We’ve identified many other potentially infringing products that we’re investigating,” he added.

Cygnus’s owner and president Gregory Swartz developed the technology laid out in the patent while working on IT consulting projects, McAndrews said. The company is looking for “a reasonable royalty” as well as a court injunction preventing further infringement, he said.

The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Arizona, where Swartz resides, McAndrews said.

Google, Microsoft and Apple did not return messages seeking comment on the lawsuit.

Cygnus applied for its patent (# 7346850) in 2001. It covers a “System and method for iconic software environment management” and was granted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in March of this year.